Comparison Overview

The Hunt Institute

VS

McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security

The Hunt Institute

4000 Centregreen Way, Cary, North Carolina, 27513, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.hunt-institute.org/

The Hunt Institute is a strategic catalyst for transforming public education and securing our country’s future. Using our depth and breadth of knowledge, we bring together the right people and resources to facilitate critical dialogue and mobilize action on the issues that matter in education. Established in 2001, The Institute honors the legacy of James B. Hunt, Jr., the former governor of North Carolina who distinguished himself as an ardent champion of education. That work continues in earnest today. Our mandate: to inspire elected officials and key policymakers to make informed decisions that result in improving the lives of all children through quality education. In 2016, the Institute became an independent, nonprofit entity and joined forces with Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy to pursue research, educational partnerships and events related to improving education policy.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security

1214 Shelby Center, Auburn, Alabama, 36849, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://mccrary.auburn.edu

The McCrary Institute for Cyber and Infrastructure Security seeks practical solutions to real-world problems, underpinned by research and scholarship. Founded in 2015 through a generous donation to Auburn University by the Alabama Power Foundation in honor of its retiring CEO and Auburn alumnus Charles D. McCrary, the Institute fuses theory with practice, and policy with technology, to protect and advance U.S. interests in the areas of cyber and critical infrastructure security.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hunt-institute.jpeg
The Hunt Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homeland-security-policy-institute.jpeg
McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Hunt Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Hunt Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security in 2025.

Incident History — The Hunt Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Hunt Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-hunt-institute.jpeg
The Hunt Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homeland-security-policy-institute.jpeg
McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Hunt Institute company and McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Hunt Institute company.

In the current year, McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company and The Hunt Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company nor The Hunt Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company nor The Hunt Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company nor The Hunt Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Hunt Institute company nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Hunt Institute company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company.

McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security company employs more people globally than The Hunt Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Hunt Institute nor McCrary Institute for Cyber & Critical Infrastructure Security holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References