Comparison Overview

The Heritage Society

VS

Hampshire Cultural Trust

The Heritage Society

US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.heritagesociety.org

The Heritage Society is the city's only outdoor, interactive historic museum and park. Nestled in 10 acres of beautiful green parkland in the heart of downtown Houston, The Heritage Society operates 10 historic structures dating from 1823 to 1905. Each year, The Heritage Society hosts countless school-aged children and visitors from around the world. Folks come from near and far to learn about the families and the lifestyles that inhabited these historic homes - what life was really like in frontier times for early settlers in Houston.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hampshire Cultural Trust

Chilcomb House, Winchester, undefined, SO32 8RD, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hampshireculture.org.uk

In our museums, arts centres and galleries, we open doors for everyone to be inspired by culture. Our venues are friendly, welcoming places where people come together to discover stories and make memories through our collections, exhibitions, projects and events. We create opportunities for people to experience culture and achieve a positive change in their lives. Each of our venues is different and part of a proud community. These unique places are at the heart of Hampshire Cultural Trust, which brings the skills and expertise to: - Care for our collection of 2.5 million objects, made accessible through our venues - Work creatively to meet the needs of people in our communities, including those who are the hardest to reach or most vulnerable - Present exciting new events and exhibitions, bringing high-quality art and experiences to Hampshire

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 149
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heritage-society.jpeg
The Heritage Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hampshire-cultural-trust.jpeg
Hampshire Cultural Trust
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Heritage Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hampshire Cultural Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Heritage Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hampshire Cultural Trust in 2026.

Incident History — The Heritage Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Heritage Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hampshire Cultural Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hampshire Cultural Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heritage-society.jpeg
The Heritage Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hampshire-cultural-trust.jpeg
Hampshire Cultural Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Heritage Society company and Hampshire Cultural Trust company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Hampshire Cultural Trust company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Heritage Society company.

In the current year, Hampshire Cultural Trust company and The Heritage Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hampshire Cultural Trust company nor The Heritage Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hampshire Cultural Trust company nor The Heritage Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hampshire Cultural Trust company nor The Heritage Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Heritage Society company nor Hampshire Cultural Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Heritage Society company nor Hampshire Cultural Trust company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hampshire Cultural Trust company employs more people globally than The Heritage Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Heritage Society nor Hampshire Cultural Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References