Comparison Overview

the Graphic Group, inc.

VS

Coast Label Company

the Graphic Group, inc.

203 Middlesex Tpke, Burlington, Massachusetts, 01803, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thegraphicgroup.com

The Graphic Group is a single source provider of print, promotional, direct mail and display graphic solutions. We combine the latest print and web technology with years of industry expertise to successfully manage our clients printing needs. Our business is built on an unyielding commitment to customer service and a network of top-notch manufacturers. We've assembled a dynamic group of industry leading companies spanning the entire print production spectrum. The relationships allow us to fit every project with the ideal technology and manufacturing process insuring your job looks good, is on time, and on budget

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Coast Label Company

17406 Mt. Cliffwood Circle, Fountain Valley, CA, 92708, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://www.coastlabel.com

Coast Label is a specialty label manufacturer that thrives on projects requiring problem solving. The core of our business has always been to deliver solutions that meet customers’ unique label needs. Founded over 40 years ago, Coast Label currently occupies a L.I.F.E.® environmentally certified facility in Fountain Valley, California. As part of our commitment to the quality of your product as well as excellent service, we maintain an ISO 9001:2015 internationally recognized quality system. Coast Label is also proud to be a four-time winner of the prestigious Eugene Singer Award for Best Managed Company. Awarded by the label industry’s trade association (TLMI), you can rest assured knowing that you are working with one of the premier companies in the industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-graphic-group-inc..jpeg
the Graphic Group, inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coast-label-company.jpeg
Coast Label Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
the Graphic Group, inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coast Label Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for the Graphic Group, inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coast Label Company in 2025.

Incident History — the Graphic Group, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

the Graphic Group, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coast Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coast Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-graphic-group-inc..jpeg
the Graphic Group, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coast-label-company.jpeg
Coast Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coast Label Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to the Graphic Group, inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coast Label Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to the Graphic Group, inc. company.

In the current year, Coast Label Company company and the Graphic Group, inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coast Label Company company nor the Graphic Group, inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coast Label Company company nor the Graphic Group, inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coast Label Company company nor the Graphic Group, inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. company nor Coast Label Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. company nor Coast Label Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

the Graphic Group, inc. company employs more people globally than Coast Label Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither the Graphic Group, inc. nor Coast Label Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References