Comparison Overview

Geneva School of Diplomacy

VS

Universität Bremen

Geneva School of Diplomacy

Chemin du Pavillon 2, Le Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, 1218, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

The Geneva School of Diplomacy (GSD) is a world-class premium degree-awarding institution specialised in the teaching and practice of International Relations & Diplomacy. We offer high-quality and praxis-oriented academic degree programmes from the bachelor to the master level, including executive education focused on both theory and the development of essential diplomatic skills. GSD also provides tailor-made programmes to meet the specific needs of corporations, missions, and schools. GSD has a multicultural and multidisciplinary academic community that blends intellectual and cultural stimulation and offers the perfect environment for people who want to study abroad in the field of International Relations and Diplomacy. Our purpose is to prepare future leaders for their roles on the world stage, advancing development, peace, and human rights.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universität Bremen

Bibliothekstraße 1 Bremen, Bremen, Bremen, 28359, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Die Universität Bremen im Profil Die Universität Bremen ist mit rund 20.000 Studierenden eine mittelgroße deutsche Universität. Für engagierte und talentierte Studierende bietet Bremen ein breites Fächerangebot: gut 100 Masterstudiengänge und Bachelorprogramme sowie das juristische Staatsexamen. Und mit dem Forschenden Lernen hat die Universität das Projektstudium, eine Besonderheit aus ihren Gründerzeiten, neu interpretiert. Als Teil des Europäischen Universitätsnetzwerks YUFE – Young Universities for the Future of Europe – entwickelt sie zusammen mit sieben anderen Universitäten ein neues Modell der europäischen Hochschulbildung. 2.300 Wissenschaftler und Wissenschaftlerinnen (43 %), darunter 270 Professuren (32 % Frauen), lehren und forschen in einem breiten Fächerspektrum an der Universität Bremen. In den Naturwissenschaften, Ingenieurwissenschaften, den Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften und in der Lehrerbildung setzt die Universität schon lange auf fächerübergreifende Zusammenarbeit und exzellente Forschung. 2012-2019 wurde Bremen mit dem Zukunftskonzept „Ambitioniert und agil“ als eine von elf Universitäten als Exzellenzuniversität gefördert. _____________________________________________________________________ Impressum: Anbieter dieser Internet-Seiten ist im Rechtssinn die Universität Bremen, vertreten durch die Rektorin. Universität Bremen Bibliothekstraße 1 28359 Bremen Telefon +49 421 218-1 Internet: www.uni-bremen.de Die Universität Bremen ist eine Körperschaft des Öffentlichen Rechts. Sie wird durch die Rektorin Prof. Dr. Jutta Günther gesetzlich vertreten. Zuständige Aufsichtsbehörde ist die Senatorin für Wissenschaft und Häfen, Katharinenstraße 37, 28195 Bremen. Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27 a UStG Umsatzsteuer-Nr.: DE 811 245 070 Redaktionell verantwortlich: Universität Bremen Referat für Hochschulkommunikation und -marketing Redaktion Social Media Telefon: +49 421 218-60154 E-Mail: [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3,018
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-geneva-school-of-diplomacy-&-international-relations.jpeg
Geneva School of Diplomacy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-bremen.jpeg
Universität Bremen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Geneva School of Diplomacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universität Bremen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geneva School of Diplomacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universität Bremen in 2025.

Incident History — Geneva School of Diplomacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geneva School of Diplomacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universität Bremen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universität Bremen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-geneva-school-of-diplomacy-&-international-relations.jpeg
Geneva School of Diplomacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-bremen.jpeg
Universität Bremen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Universität Bremen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Geneva School of Diplomacy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universität Bremen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Geneva School of Diplomacy company.

In the current year, Universität Bremen company and Geneva School of Diplomacy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universität Bremen company nor Geneva School of Diplomacy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universität Bremen company nor Geneva School of Diplomacy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universität Bremen company nor Geneva School of Diplomacy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy company nor Universität Bremen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Universität Bremen company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Geneva School of Diplomacy company.

Universität Bremen company employs more people globally than Geneva School of Diplomacy company, reflecting its scale as a Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Geneva School of Diplomacy nor Universität Bremen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L