Comparison Overview

The Gary Law Group

VS

850-CALL-JOE

The Gary Law Group

2000 One Main Place, Portland, Oregon, 97204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Gary Law Group provides all-inclusive legal representation and best practices consulting for manufacturers and sellers of windows, doors and skylights. For the last 20 years our knowledgeable and experienced lawyers have worked with clients in the fenestration markeplace to identify their issues and with our insight and expertise, guide our clients and implement a solution tailored to their needs. The Gary Law Group has successfully represented businesses from around the country that encounter product liability claims, and product specification claims in both the individual case and class action settings. Our 20 years of experience has afforded us the ability to anticipate issues before they arise, with that we are able to create a solid legal foundation for your company to eliminate unnecessary risk.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

850-CALL-JOE

1728 S. Bumby Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Attorney Joe Knape encompasses a diverse and competent background in the legal industry due to his extensive courtroom experience over the past six years. He is dedicated to not only providing the highest quality legal services available, but also the most proficient and personable. As a trusted community advisor, Attorney Joe Knape’s mission is creating that one-on-one relationship with his clientele—a commonly sought after aspect that is often neglected in the legal world. Settling with anything less than the best is not an option in Joe Knape’s legal cases.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-gary-law-group.jpeg
The Gary Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/850-call-joe.jpeg
850-CALL-JOE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Gary Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
850-CALL-JOE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Gary Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 850-CALL-JOE in 2025.

Incident History — The Gary Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Gary Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 850-CALL-JOE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

850-CALL-JOE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-gary-law-group.jpeg
The Gary Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/850-call-joe.jpeg
850-CALL-JOE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

850-CALL-JOE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Gary Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 850-CALL-JOE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Gary Law Group company.

In the current year, 850-CALL-JOE company and The Gary Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 850-CALL-JOE company nor The Gary Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 850-CALL-JOE company nor The Gary Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 850-CALL-JOE company nor The Gary Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Gary Law Group company nor 850-CALL-JOE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Gary Law Group company nor 850-CALL-JOE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Gary Law Group company employs more people globally than 850-CALL-JOE company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Gary Law Group nor 850-CALL-JOE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X