Comparison Overview

The Fugard Theatre

VS

Wet Picnic

The Fugard Theatre

Cape Town, Western Cape 8000, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://thefugard.com

The Fugard Theatre as an artistic and producing house has closed permanently and will not open again. The Founding Producer of the Fugard, Eric Abraham has, after 10 years of philanthropic support, returned the building that housed the Fugard Theatre to the freehold owner, The District 6 Museum, in 2021. The building has been returned as a fully equipped theatre, with two working performance spaces, in the hope that it will be able to be used for the benefit of the Museum and the District 6 Community.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wet Picnic

Theatre Royal Winchester, Winchester, SO23 8SB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wetpicnic.com

Wet Picnic are a collective of super creative, ridiculous and talented makers of theatrical experiences. We create unforgettable theatre that tours globally, bespoke experiences and immersive events. Previous clients include; The Natural History Museum, The World Expo - Shanghai, The ATP Tennis Masters, London 2012 Olympics, The British Council, Glastonbury Festival, Latitude Festival, The Mayor of London, Henley Festival, The Royal Albert Hall, Arkhangelsk Festival - Russia, Stoppested Verden - Norway, Wales Millennium Centre, Brighton Festival, Just for Laughs - Canada, Manchester International Arts “The moving masters of absurdity” - Stewart Collins - Director, Henley Festival "a baby Complicitè" - Adrian Berry, Artistic Director, Jacksons Lane “Even the people who didn't understand a word of English were dying with laughter” - British Council, Shanghai "The balance between learning how forensic analysis is conducted and the playful humour is spot on and we found ourselves intrigued and entertained throughout the evening". – The Londonist, Crime Scene Live, Natural History Museum★★★★ We like to take life, explode it and put it all back together again, in our imaginative explorations, where the ordinary becomes extraordinary.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fugard-theatre.jpeg
The Fugard Theatre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wet-picnic.jpeg
Wet Picnic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Fugard Theatre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wet Picnic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Fugard Theatre in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wet Picnic in 2025.

Incident History — The Fugard Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Fugard Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wet Picnic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wet Picnic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fugard-theatre.jpeg
The Fugard Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wet-picnic.jpeg
Wet Picnic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wet Picnic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Fugard Theatre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wet Picnic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Fugard Theatre company.

In the current year, Wet Picnic company and The Fugard Theatre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wet Picnic company nor The Fugard Theatre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wet Picnic company nor The Fugard Theatre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wet Picnic company nor The Fugard Theatre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Fugard Theatre company nor Wet Picnic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Fugard Theatre company nor Wet Picnic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wet Picnic company employs more people globally than The Fugard Theatre company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Fugard Theatre nor Wet Picnic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References