Comparison Overview

The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions

VS

Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center)

The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions

41 Pretoria Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2194, ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The Foundation Clinic's core values are education, integration and professionalism within the substance abuse and addiction treatment and recovery industry. The Foundation clinic offers a continuum of care from in-patient detox and primary treatment of substance abuse and behaviour disorders, to aftercare and a Recovery Wellness program. The Foundation Clinic is working in affiliation with FRC International to train and certify Recovery Coaches to an internationally standard, as well as being involved in community development and CSI initiatives through the U-ACt Trust. The Foundation Clinic is also involved in drug awareness education through participation in wellness days, workshops and training facilitation. There is an emphasis on supporting individuals, families and communities that are affected by substance abuse and co-occuring disorders through the various treatment and recovery options that The Foundation Clinic offers. The clinic has a multidisciplinary, professional staff including the head of the therapeutic program Dr Michael Niss, who is assisted by fellow psychologist Chris Sampson. The clinic is supported by on-call medical doctors who are also highly experienced in the field of substance abuse and addiction. The staff also consists of addiction counsellors, a social worker, internationally-certified recovery coaches and a 24-hour nursing staff. The treatment program is extremely diversified and includes activities and processes aimed towards building emotional, social, mental, physical and spiritual recovery capital for the individual and their support network. Each patient is treated as an individual with unique treatment and recovery needs and goals, as The Foundation Clinic supports multiple pathways to recovery through the support and guidance of the treatment and recovery staff. Please contact our professional, qualified assessment and admissions team to assist you with any queries or further information.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center)

4054 McKinney Avenue, Dallas, Texas, 75204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Legacy Counseling Center is a 33-year-old non-profit organization providing affordable and quality mental health care, substance abuse treatment, and housing services to people living with HIV/AIDS. Legacy was founded by a group of psychotherapists who were passionate about improving life for people living with and suffering from HIV/AIDS. Since they began, we have assisted thousands of clients, creating a healthier community by intervening with exactly the right care at a client’s moment of crisis. We are now the largest and primary provider of HIV-specific counseling services in North Texas and are widely regarded as best-practice providers and pioneers in the world of HIV-informed care. Want to get involved with Legacy as a volunteer? Email [email protected]!

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-foundation-clinic.jpeg
The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legacy-counseling-center.jpeg
Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) in 2026.

Incident History — The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-foundation-clinic.jpeg
The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legacy-counseling-center.jpeg
Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company and Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company.

In the current year, Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company and The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company nor The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company nor The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company nor The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company.

Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) company employs more people globally than The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Foundation Clinic | Mental Health Recovery Solutions nor Legacy Cares (Legacy Counseling Center) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N