Comparison Overview

The Fortune Society

VS

Gemeente Eindhoven

The Fortune Society

29-76 Northern Boulevard, Long Island City, NY, 11101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Fortune Society’s mission is to support successful reentry from incarceration and promote alternatives to incarceration, thus strengthening the fabric of our communities. We do this by: - BELIEVING in the power of individuals to change; - BUILDING LIVES through service programs shaped by the needs and experience of our participants; and - CHANGING MINDS through education and advocacy to promote the creation of a fair, humane, and truly rehabilitative correctional system.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 649
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gemeente Eindhoven

Stadhuisplein 2, Eindhoven, 5611, NL
Last Update:

Eindhoven is dé stad van innovatie, technologie, design en vooral van toekomst. In het hart van onze snelgroeiende stad werken we met ruim 2700 collega’s vol energie aan een fijne stad om in te wonen, werken en recreëren. Met betrokken bewoners, partners en maatschappelijke instanties staan we samen voor onze stad. Meer weten over werken voor gemeente Eindhoven? Kijk op werkenvooreindhoven.nl

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 2,990
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fortune-society.jpeg
The Fortune Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-eindhoven.jpeg
Gemeente Eindhoven
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Fortune Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gemeente Eindhoven
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Fortune Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Eindhoven in 2025.

Incident History — The Fortune Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Fortune Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gemeente Eindhoven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Eindhoven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fortune-society.jpeg
The Fortune Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-eindhoven.jpeg
Gemeente Eindhoven
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemeente Eindhoven company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Fortune Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gemeente Eindhoven company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Fortune Society company.

In the current year, Gemeente Eindhoven company and The Fortune Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gemeente Eindhoven company nor The Fortune Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gemeente Eindhoven company nor The Fortune Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gemeente Eindhoven company nor The Fortune Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Fortune Society company nor Gemeente Eindhoven company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Fortune Society company nor Gemeente Eindhoven company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Eindhoven company employs more people globally than The Fortune Society company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Fortune Society nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H