Comparison Overview

The Findling Law Firm, PLC

VS

Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

The Findling Law Firm, PLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Findling Law Firm, PLC is a unique law firm. Family owned and operated since it's inception, The Findling Law Firm, PLC was established in 1957. We take great pride in "A Family of Lawyers" because we treat each of our clients as if they were a member of our family. We deliver the highest level of legal skill with compassion to our client's needs. Over the years, we have earned the respect and trust of law firms throughout the state, the courts, small and large businesses and individuals. Our firm has earned a reputation as being hardworking, trustworthy, and zealous advocates. We relish in taking cases that most firms would shy away from. We look forward to working with you. And of course, welcome to our family...

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

116 W Ottawa St, Lansing, MI, 48933, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan (PAAM) is a voluntary association of the 83 county prosecutors, the Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorneys serving in Michigan. It is a non-profit Michigan Corporation, and is tax exempt under section 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. PAAM was founded in 1928. Its mission is stated in Michigan Compiled Law Section 49.62: "It shall be the duty of the prosecuting attorneys'​ association to keep the prosecuting attorneys of the state informed of all changes in legislation, law, and matters pertaining to their office through the department of attorney general of the state of Michigan, to the end that a uniform system of conduct, duty and procedure be established in each county of the state."​ It is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of: 5 officers, 14 elected directors, active past presidents and the Attorney General.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-findling-law-firm-plc.jpeg
The Findling Law Firm, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosecuting-attorneys-association-of-michigan.jpeg
Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Findling Law Firm, PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Findling Law Firm, PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan in 2025.

Incident History — The Findling Law Firm, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Findling Law Firm, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-findling-law-firm-plc.jpeg
The Findling Law Firm, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosecuting-attorneys-association-of-michigan.jpeg
Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Findling Law Firm, PLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Findling Law Firm, PLC company.

In the current year, Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company and The Findling Law Firm, PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company nor The Findling Law Firm, PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company nor The Findling Law Firm, PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company nor The Findling Law Firm, PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC company nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC company nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan company employs more people globally than The Findling Law Firm, PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Findling Law Firm, PLC nor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X