Comparison Overview

Field Museum

VS

The King Arts Complex

Field Museum

1400 S Lakeshore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fieldmuseum.org

Now in its 125th year, the Field Museum is a forward-thinking scientific leader on a mission to explore, protect, and celebrate nature and culture. The Field takes part in groundbreaking research all over the world while maintaining one of the world’s largest collections of artifacts and specimens, used to inspire discovery, spark public engagement with science, and uncover solutions for a better world. To share its scientific and educational mission, the Field welcomes 1.6 million visitors every year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 842
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The King Arts Complex

867 Mt. Vernon Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, 43203, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kingartscomplex.com

Opened in March 1987, after the renovation of the Pythian Theater, The King Arts Complex is located on the near East side of Columbus, Ohio, in one of the oldest areas of African-American life in the city. With an additional renovation, Phase II opened in October 1989 creating a 60,000 square foot facility. Serving as a major anchor for development in the King-Lincoln District, The King Arts Complex is an oasis for cultural and educational activities as well as community facility for special events. The mission of The King Arts Complex is to enrich and improve the quality of life in our community and society, creating enhanced understanding and harmony by preserving, presenting and fostering the contributions of African Americans through creative expression and education while building bridges of harmony and connecting links between all people. Through a multidisciplinary approach, The King Arts Complex offers performing, cultural and educational programs that provide high artistic merit, varied and diverse experiences, and which increase and disseminate knowledge regarding the vast and significant contributions of African-Americans to the culture and history of America and the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-field-museum.jpeg
Field Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-king-arts-complex.jpeg
The King Arts Complex
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Field Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The King Arts Complex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Field Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The King Arts Complex in 2026.

Incident History — Field Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Field Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The King Arts Complex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The King Arts Complex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-field-museum.jpeg
Field Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-king-arts-complex.jpeg
The King Arts Complex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Field Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The King Arts Complex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The King Arts Complex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Field Museum company.

In the current year, The King Arts Complex company and Field Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The King Arts Complex company nor Field Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The King Arts Complex company nor Field Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The King Arts Complex company nor Field Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Field Museum company nor The King Arts Complex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Field Museum company nor The King Arts Complex company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Field Museum company employs more people globally than The King Arts Complex company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Field Museum nor The King Arts Complex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References