Comparison Overview

The Elizabeth Hospice

VS

Bupa

The Elizabeth Hospice

800 W Valley Pkwy, Suite 100, Escondido, California, US, 92025
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://elizabethhospice.org

The Elizabeth Hospice, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, provides medical, emotional and spiritual support to children and adults faced with the challenges associated with a life-threatening illness, and restores hope to grieving children and adults who are feeling lost and alone. Since 1978, the organization has cared for more than 125,000 people in San Diego County and Southwest Riverside County. The Elizabeth Hospice is accredited by The Joint Commission and is a member of the California Hospice and Palliative Care Association and the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. Federal Tax ID 95-3275679

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 302
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Bupa

Main locations, UK, Australia, Spain, Chile, Poland, New Zealand, Hong Kong SAR, Türkiye, Brazil, Mexico, the US, Middle East, Ireland, Saudi Arabia and India., undefined, Various, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bupa.com

Bupa's purpose is helping people live longer, healthier, happier lives and making a better world. We are an international healthcare company serving over 38 million customers worldwide. With no shareholders, we reinvest profits into providing more and better healthcare for the benefit of current and future customers. We directly employ around 85,000 people, principally in the UK, Australia, Spain, Chile, Poland, New Zealand, Hong Kong SAR, Türkiye, Brazil, Mexico, the US, Middle East and Ireland. We also have associate businesses in Saudi Arabia and India. For more information, visit www.bupa.com

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,596
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-elizabeth-hospice.jpeg
The Elizabeth Hospice
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bupa.jpeg
Bupa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Elizabeth Hospice
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bupa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Elizabeth Hospice in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bupa in 2025.

Incident History — The Elizabeth Hospice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Elizabeth Hospice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bupa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bupa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-elizabeth-hospice.jpeg
The Elizabeth Hospice
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bupa.jpeg
Bupa
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bupa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Elizabeth Hospice company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Elizabeth Hospice and Bupa have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Bupa company and The Elizabeth Hospice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bupa company nor The Elizabeth Hospice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Bupa company and The Elizabeth Hospice company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Bupa company nor The Elizabeth Hospice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice company nor Bupa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Elizabeth Hospice company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bupa company.

Bupa company employs more people globally than The Elizabeth Hospice company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Elizabeth Hospice nor Bupa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References