Comparison Overview

The Electronic Easel

VS

Unbranded Design Collective

The Electronic Easel

23 Empire Drive, Saint Paul, MN, 55103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Are you looking for a design firm that puts you, the client and your brand or product first, then you've come to the right site. We provide exceptional creative resulting in beautiful design work across multiple mediums from print, to web, to mobile app design and much more. Right here in the Twin Cities. Our goal is to grow your business or the product(s) you produce and sell. We will leverage our 20+ years experience in idea generation but we often find it's best to firstly listen to our clients. Let you share your story, your own ideas and partner with you versus simply telling you what to do. Choose The Electronic Easel and start a productive relationship with your creative design firm.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unbranded Design Collective

102 Fardoss Tower, Fardoss Street. , Damascus, undefined, undefined, SY
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Unbranded is a design collective providing services in branding, designing mobile and web applications, as well as websites and any form of marketing collaterals. We work on innovative methods of visual representation, branding philosophy, and interactivity by matching clients to the right designers from the Unbranded Collective's designers. Our main focus is to create a stimulating product that creates maximum exposure for the client in a refined and minimal aesthetic while staying true to the identity of the client.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-electronic-easel.jpeg
The Electronic Easel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unbrandeddesign.jpeg
Unbranded Design Collective
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Electronic Easel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unbranded Design Collective
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Electronic Easel in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unbranded Design Collective in 2025.

Incident History — The Electronic Easel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Electronic Easel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unbranded Design Collective (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unbranded Design Collective cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-electronic-easel.jpeg
The Electronic Easel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unbrandeddesign.jpeg
Unbranded Design Collective
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Electronic Easel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Unbranded Design Collective company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Unbranded Design Collective company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Electronic Easel company.

In the current year, Unbranded Design Collective company and The Electronic Easel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unbranded Design Collective company nor The Electronic Easel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unbranded Design Collective company nor The Electronic Easel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unbranded Design Collective company nor The Electronic Easel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Electronic Easel company nor Unbranded Design Collective company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Electronic Easel company nor Unbranded Design Collective company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Electronic Easel company employs more people globally than Unbranded Design Collective company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Electronic Easel nor Unbranded Design Collective holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X