Comparison Overview

Earnscliffe Strategies

VS

Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies

Earnscliffe Strategies

46 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1C7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1989 and independently owned by our principals, Earnscliffe operates from offices in Ottawa-Gatineau, Toronto and Vancouver. We offer our clients a unique understanding of the country and where it intersects in the world. Our leadership team includes former government policymakers, business leaders, academics, award-winning journalists and public opinion analysts. We are a recognized leader in each of our service offerings: government relations, communications and digital, and opinion research. Our strength is in understanding our clients, their environment, and the environment in which decisions are being made that will affect them and their outcomes – and then translating that into the necessary strategies for our clients to succeed. Our longevity and success are based on one key principle: providing our clients with the best available advice. Period. Earnscliffe is also a member of Fipra International Ltd., an international network of independent strategic advisors operating in over 50 countries – meaning full global reach while preserving the service excellence and senior expertise of an independent firm. Through our affiliation with Fipra, we also have representatives in Brussels and China.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies

1100 First Street, NE, Washington, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1902, the Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies is the professional organization that serves as the collective voice of North America’s fish and wildlife agencies. Our mission is to support and advocate for state, provincial and territorial authority for fish and wildlife conservation and to assist those agencies in promoting science-based resource management in collaboration with public and private partners.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-earnscliffe-strategy-group.jpeg
Earnscliffe Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-of-fish-and-wildlife-agencies.jpeg
Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Earnscliffe Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Earnscliffe Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies in 2025.

Incident History — Earnscliffe Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Earnscliffe Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-earnscliffe-strategy-group.jpeg
Earnscliffe Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-of-fish-and-wildlife-agencies.jpeg
Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Earnscliffe Strategies company and Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Earnscliffe Strategies company.

In the current year, Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company and Earnscliffe Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company nor Earnscliffe Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company nor Earnscliffe Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company nor Earnscliffe Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies company nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies company nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Earnscliffe Strategies company employs more people globally than Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Earnscliffe Strategies nor Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N