Comparison Overview

The De Morgan Collection

VS

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

The De Morgan Collection

Cannon Hall Museum, Bark House Lane, Cawthorne, Barnsley, England, GB, S75 4AT
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.demorgan.org.uk/

The De Morgan Foundation owns and cares for the De Morgan Collection, an unparalleled collection of ceramics and oil paintings by William and Evelyn De Morgan. The husband and wife duo were key proponents of the Arts and Crafts Movement in the late 19th and early 20th Century. The De Morgan Foundation is a registered, independent charity that receives no revenue funding from the government. All income goes towards managing the care of the De Morgan Collection, loans, tours, research and educational activities. The De Morgan Foundation has its own museum at Cannon Hall Museum in Barnsley, as well as long-term partnership arrangements with a number of museums and galleries across the UK. Major loans from the De Morgan Collection are on display at The Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, Watts Gallery in Guildford, and Wightwick Manor (National Trust) in Wolverhampton, as well as loans of artworks to other arts and heritage institutions nationally and internationally.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.culturalheritage.org/jaic

The Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (JAIC) is the primary vehicle for the publication of peer-reviewed technical studies, research papers, treatment case studies and ethics and standards discussions relating to the broad field of conservation and preservation of historic and cultural works. Subscribers to JAIC include AIC members, both individuals and institutions, as well as major libraries and universities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-de-morgan-foundation.jpeg
The De Morgan Collection
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journal-of-the-american-institute-for-conservation.jpeg
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The De Morgan Collection
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The De Morgan Collection in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Journal of the American Institute for Conservation in 2026.

Incident History — The De Morgan Collection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The De Morgan Collection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-de-morgan-foundation.jpeg
The De Morgan Collection
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journal-of-the-american-institute-for-conservation.jpeg
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The De Morgan Collection company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The De Morgan Collection company.

In the current year, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company and The De Morgan Collection company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company nor The De Morgan Collection company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company nor The De Morgan Collection company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company nor The De Morgan Collection company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The De Morgan Collection company nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The De Morgan Collection company nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The De Morgan Collection company employs more people globally than Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The De Morgan Collection nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References