Comparison Overview

The Dartmouth Apologia

VS

Channel BV

The Dartmouth Apologia

Hanover, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We the staff of The Dartmouth Apologia are Christians. We believe that the mystery of God was revealed in Jesus, and he demonstrated his matchless love for us through his life, death, and resurrection. We formed this journal because we believe that Christianity is as relevant and important today as it was in the first century. Inspired by the early Christian apologists, we seek to articulate Christian perspectives in the academic community.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Channel BV

Communicatieweg 1, Mijdrecht, 3641 SG, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

For more than twelve years, Channel BV is a respected authority for data, information and expertise in the areas of telecoms, IT and CE. Channel BV manages a wide portfolio of magazines, websites and events, carefully segmented to address different target groups (Connexie Magazine, ChannelConnect, ICT Update, Telecommagazine and CE-Tail). In addition, Channel BV offers a wide range of communication tools for B2B and B2C customers. Channel BV continuously creates and develops new (multimedia) products and services, ranging from product databases (e.g. Digi-Source), customized magazines, e-zines, e-mail newsletters, websites, content marketing to apps and events. Joint ventures with leading publishers and product testlabs enable Channel BV to reach out to millions of consumers in the Dutch market.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-dartmouth-apologia.jpeg
The Dartmouth Apologia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/channel-bv.jpeg
Channel BV
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Dartmouth Apologia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Channel BV
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dartmouth Apologia in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Channel BV in 2025.

Incident History — The Dartmouth Apologia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dartmouth Apologia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Channel BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Channel BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-dartmouth-apologia.jpeg
The Dartmouth Apologia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/channel-bv.jpeg
Channel BV
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Dartmouth Apologia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Channel BV company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Channel BV company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Dartmouth Apologia company.

In the current year, Channel BV company and The Dartmouth Apologia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Channel BV company nor The Dartmouth Apologia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Channel BV company nor The Dartmouth Apologia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Channel BV company nor The Dartmouth Apologia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia company nor Channel BV company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia company nor Channel BV company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Dartmouth Apologia company employs more people globally than Channel BV company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Dartmouth Apologia nor Channel BV holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.