Comparison Overview

The Contemporary Jewish Museum

VS

Ethnographic Museum Zagreb

The Contemporary Jewish Museum

736 Mission St, San Francisco, 94103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since its founding in 1984, the Contemporary Jewish Museum (CJM) has distinguished itself as a welcoming place where visitors can connect with one another through dialogue and shared experiences with the arts. Ever changing, the CJM is a non-collecting institution that partners with national and international cultural institutions to present exhibitions that are both timely and relevant and represent the highest level of artistic achievement and scholarship. The CJM makes the diversity of the Jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first century audience. We accomplish this through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ethnographic Museum Zagreb

10000, HR
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

The Ethnographic Museum in Zagreb was established in 1919 and its collections mainly consist of textile objects (national folk costumes), but there are also numerous collections of traditional economy, handicraft, home inventory, crafts and customs from all regions of Croatia, as well as items from non-European countries. At present the museum has approximately 90 000 objects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-contemporary-jewish-museum.jpeg
The Contemporary Jewish Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ethnographic Museum Zagreb
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Contemporary Jewish Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ethnographic Museum Zagreb
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Contemporary Jewish Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ethnographic Museum Zagreb in 2026.

Incident History — The Contemporary Jewish Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Contemporary Jewish Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ethnographic Museum Zagreb (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ethnographic Museum Zagreb cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-contemporary-jewish-museum.jpeg
The Contemporary Jewish Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ethnographic Museum Zagreb
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Contemporary Jewish Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Contemporary Jewish Museum company.

In the current year, Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company and The Contemporary Jewish Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company nor The Contemporary Jewish Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company nor The Contemporary Jewish Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company nor The Contemporary Jewish Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum company nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum company nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Contemporary Jewish Museum company employs more people globally than Ethnographic Museum Zagreb company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Contemporary Jewish Museum nor Ethnographic Museum Zagreb holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H