Comparison Overview

The Columbus Museum

VS

The Frick Collection

The Columbus Museum

1251 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, Georgia, 31906, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://comuga.org

The Columbus Museum brings American art and history to life for the communities of the Chattahoochee Valley. Celebrate creativity and culture through the experience of American art, regional history, tranquil gardens, and more. As a destination for people of all interests and ages, The Columbus Museum — or COMU — has something for everyone — from the art enthusiast to the history buff, the nature lover to the leisure visitor — it's free and it's all in one space!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Frick Collection

1 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frick.org

The Frick Collection is your home for art from the Renaissance to the late nineteenth century. Founded by Henry Clay Frick and open since 1935, the museum offers visitors intimate encounters with one of the world’s foremost collections of European fine and decorative arts. The Frick—whose renovated Fifth Avenue buildings will reopen in April 2025—features celebrated works by Rembrandt, Fragonard, Ingres, Bellini, Vermeer, and more. The Frick Art Research Library, a leading art historical research center, was established one hundred years ago by Helen Clay Frick and provides access to its rich collections for scholars and the public. Stay connected at frick.org/explore.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-columbus-museum-inc-.jpeg
The Columbus Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-frick-collection.jpeg
The Frick Collection
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Columbus Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Frick Collection
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Columbus Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Frick Collection in 2026.

Incident History — The Columbus Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Columbus Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Frick Collection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Frick Collection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-columbus-museum-inc-.jpeg
The Columbus Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-frick-collection.jpeg
The Frick Collection
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Frick Collection company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Columbus Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Frick Collection company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Columbus Museum company.

In the current year, The Frick Collection company and The Columbus Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Frick Collection company nor The Columbus Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Frick Collection company nor The Columbus Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Frick Collection company nor The Columbus Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Columbus Museum company nor The Frick Collection company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Columbus Museum company nor The Frick Collection company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Frick Collection company employs more people globally than The Columbus Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Columbus Museum nor The Frick Collection holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References