Comparison Overview

The Clinic on Dupont

VS

Legacy Endeavors

The Clinic on Dupont

99 and 101 Dupont St. , Toronto, Ontario, M5R 1V4 , CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Clinic on Dupont is a private psychology clinic in Toronto, Ontario that specializes in cognitive behavioural and interpersonally-oriented psychotherapy. Our highly trained, multi-disciplinary team of Registered Psychologists, Social Workers, Psychotherapists, and Addiction Specialists specializes in comprehensive and individualized psychological, neuropsychological, and psycho-educational assessments. We provide specialized treatment for a wide spectrum of problems, including addictions, phobias, stress, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, marital issues, and solutions for families coping with conflict and life transitions, such as separation and divorce. We welcome children, adolescents and adults seeking individual, couples, and family therapy. Our primary mode of treatment is cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). Supported by decades of research, CBT is a comprehensive talk therapy modality designed to give clients the skills to change how they think, how they feel, and what they do. The Clinic is housed in a beautiful Victorian building in an upscale neighbourhood in central Toronto. Your privacy, comfort, and confidentiality are of the utmost importance to us. Our building is discrete and professional. Inside, you’ll find a casual and comfortable setting that feels like you’ve walked into someone’s living room.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legacy Endeavors

None
Last Update:

Founded in November, 1999, Legacy Endeavors is dedicated to providing quality personalized supports for adults with disabilities. We are able to offer: In-home support Residential services where either the individual(s) or Legacy is the lease holder for the apartment or home. Residential services can be licensed under Adult Foster Care and serve 1-4 people, or supported living services can be offered in unlicensed locations. For details, please contact Ann Ward at 651-653-3669. Supported Employment: we use Discovering Personal Genius methods Independent Living Services Mission Statement: At Legacy we strive for excellence in working with individuals with disabilities. Our innovative approach emphasizes balance, a positive attitude and open communication to promote happiness, friendship and personal growth for both supported individuals and employees.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-clinic-on-dupont.jpeg
The Clinic on Dupont
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legacy-endeavors.jpeg
Legacy Endeavors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Clinic on Dupont
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legacy Endeavors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Clinic on Dupont in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legacy Endeavors in 2026.

Incident History — The Clinic on Dupont (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Clinic on Dupont cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legacy Endeavors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legacy Endeavors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-clinic-on-dupont.jpeg
The Clinic on Dupont
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legacy-endeavors.jpeg
Legacy Endeavors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Legacy Endeavors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Clinic on Dupont company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legacy Endeavors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Clinic on Dupont company.

In the current year, Legacy Endeavors company and The Clinic on Dupont company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legacy Endeavors company nor The Clinic on Dupont company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legacy Endeavors company nor The Clinic on Dupont company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legacy Endeavors company nor The Clinic on Dupont company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont company nor Legacy Endeavors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont company nor Legacy Endeavors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Clinic on Dupont company employs more people globally than Legacy Endeavors company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Clinic on Dupont nor Legacy Endeavors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N