Comparison Overview

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

VS

National Association of Christian Ministers

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

50 East North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT, US, 84150
Last Update: 2026-01-19

"This work is so liberating: to be employed in an organization wherein we have the ultimate freedom to use true principles of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ in our work each day. Having access to all truth and applying it in our daily performance is the most liberating thing I know. This truly is the work of the kingdom of God."​ —Elder David A. Bednar of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles Church employees find joy and satisfaction in using their unique talents and abilities to further the Lord’s work. From the IT professional who develops an app that sends the gospel message worldwide -- to the facilities manager who maintains our buildings, giving Church members places to worship, teach, learn, and receive sacred ordinances, our employees seek innovative ways to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with the world. They are literally working in the Kingdom. Find your next job within Church employment here: http://careersearch.churchofjesuschrist.org

NAICS: 8131
NAICS Definition: Religious Organizations
Employees: 25,177
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

National Association of Christian Ministers

2123 Old Spartanburg Rd. Ste. 303 Greer, SC 29650, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

The National Association of Christian Ministers is an alliance of Christian ministers from all evangelical denominational backgrounds. Our purpose is to answer God's call to advance the gospel and unite the Body of Christ. We do this through education, fellowship, ordination, and ministerial licensing. You may visit our public site at: http://www.nacministers.com

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints--.jpeg
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-association-of-christian-ministers.jpeg
National Association of Christian Ministers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Association of Christian Ministers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Religious Institutions Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in 2026.

Incidents vs Religious Institutions Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Association of Christian Ministers in 2026.

Incident History — The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Association of Christian Ministers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Association of Christian Ministers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints--.jpeg
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-association-of-christian-ministers.jpeg
National Association of Christian Ministers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Association of Christian Ministers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas National Association of Christian Ministers company has not reported any.

In the current year, National Association of Christian Ministers company and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Association of Christian Ministers company nor The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Association of Christian Ministers company nor The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while National Association of Christian Ministers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company nor National Association of Christian Ministers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company nor National Association of Christian Ministers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints company employs more people globally than National Association of Christian Ministers company, reflecting its scale as a Religious Institutions.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints nor National Association of Christian Ministers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N