Comparison Overview

The Christman Company

VS

Stroygazmontazh LLC

The Christman Company

208 N. Capitol Avenue, Lansing, Michigan, 48933-1357, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

The Christman Company, in operation since 1894, is one of the nationโ€™s foremost commercial construction management firms. Partnering with leading organizations, The Christman Company is known for โ€œUniting Great People in Great Achievement.โ€ With 8 offices across the country, our major markets include public, government, healthcare, historic preservation, office, education, parking, science/technology, cultural/religious, hospitality, sports/recreation, transportation and industrial/power. We define excellence as the ability to add value to each project through delivery of expertise, leadership andโ€”above allโ€”partnership.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 532
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stroygazmontazh LLC

Last Update: 2025-05-02 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Mission Stroygazmontazh realizes oil and gas construction projects at all levels of complexity. It does so safely, quickly, at high quality, and with dependability for the benefit of our customers, partners, and society as a whole. Principles of Work โ€” Strict adherence to rules of industrial safety โ€” Attention to environmental protection and use of low-impact technology โ€” Openness and transparency in conducting business โ€” Discipline, honesty, and decency โ€” Understanding risks we face and making accurate assessments of them โ€” Financial responsibility to customers โ€” Heightened attention to quality of construction work and construction objects. Goals While retaining a key role in the oil and gas construction market in Russia, Stroygazmontazh intends to acquire an enduring position in the international market, in oil and gas infrastructure development

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-christman-company.jpeg
The Christman Company
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stroygazmontazh-llc.jpeg
Stroygazmontazh LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
The Christman Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stroygazmontazh LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Christman Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stroygazmontazh LLC in 2025.

Incident History โ€” The Christman Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Christman Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Stroygazmontazh LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stroygazmontazh LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-christman-company.jpeg
The Christman Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stroygazmontazh-llc.jpeg
Stroygazmontazh LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Christman Company company and Stroygazmontazh LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Stroygazmontazh LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Christman Company company.

In the current year, Stroygazmontazh LLC company and The Christman Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stroygazmontazh LLC company nor The Christman Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stroygazmontazh LLC company nor The Christman Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stroygazmontazh LLC company nor The Christman Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Christman Company company nor Stroygazmontazh LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

The Christman Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stroygazmontazh LLC company.

The Christman Company company employs more people globally than Stroygazmontazh LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X