Comparison Overview

The Children's Museum of New Hampshire

VS

LancasterHistory

The Children's Museum of New Hampshire

6 Washington Street, Dover, NH, 03820, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.childrens-museum.org/

We are NH's children's museum, located on the banks of the Cochecho River in Dover. Our one-of-a-kind, hands-on exhibits have been created by our staff and NH artisans for kids ages 1-12. Open year round right in Henry Law Park. General Information The Children's Museum of NH offers two floors of unique, interactive exhibits for children ages 1-12 and their families. Explore world cultures, under-sea research, brain waves, dinosaurs, music, nature and much more. Expanded location in a waterfront park in Dover includes shop, snack area, outdoor playground and plenty of parking. Join our linkedin Group at: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&gid=2341612&trk=myg_ugrp_ovr

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LancasterHistory

230 North President Avenue, Lancaster, PA, 17603, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lancasterhistory.org

LancasterHistory engages and educates the public about the people, places, and events that shaped Lancaster County within the broader context of the history of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States of America. As custodians of a complex past, we collect, preserve, exhibit, and make accessible materials chronicling Lancaster County’s heritage as we seek to engage audiences in multi-layered stories of that past.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum-of-new-hampshire.jpeg
The Children's Museum of New Hampshire
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lancasterhistory.org.jpeg
LancasterHistory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Children's Museum of New Hampshire
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LancasterHistory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Children's Museum of New Hampshire in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LancasterHistory in 2026.

Incident History — The Children's Museum of New Hampshire (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Children's Museum of New Hampshire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LancasterHistory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LancasterHistory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum-of-new-hampshire.jpeg
The Children's Museum of New Hampshire
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lancasterhistory.org.jpeg
LancasterHistory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LancasterHistory company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LancasterHistory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company.

In the current year, LancasterHistory company and The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LancasterHistory company nor The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LancasterHistory company nor The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LancasterHistory company nor The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company nor LancasterHistory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company nor LancasterHistory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LancasterHistory company employs more people globally than The Children's Museum of New Hampshire company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of New Hampshire nor LancasterHistory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References