Comparison Overview

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis

VS

Dumbarton Oaks

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis

3000 North Meridian Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is extraordinary—always! Through its world-class exhibits, the museum strives to excite and encourage family learning and curiosity by providing limitless opportunities to create memories and foster a sense of discovery. The mission of The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is to create extraordinary learning experiences across the arts, sciences, and humanities that have the power to transform the lives of children and families. With 472,900 square feet and five floors of family learning, The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is the world’s biggest and best children’s museum. Here you can discover new worlds, talk with real experts, and see authentic artifacts in always-changing exhibits.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 411
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dumbarton Oaks

1703 32nd St NW, Washington, 20007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Dumbarton Oaks is the legacy of Robert and Mildred Woods Bliss to Harvard University and to the humanities. Located in the historic Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, DC, Dumbarton Oaks is an institute of Harvard University that supports scholarship in Byzantine, Pre-Columbian and Garden and Landscape Studies. The multiple aspects of the Blisses’ gift include historic gardens and buildings, world-class collections for researchers and the public to enjoy, and generous support for fellowships and scholarly endeavors on the local, national, and international levels. Our mission is, first, to maintain what we have been entrusted by the Blisses to preserve. Second, to support the pursuit of the humanities as a whole, with particular focus on the disciplines of Byzantine, Pre-Columbian, and Garden and Landscape Studies. Third, to honor the intention of the donors by achieving the greatest mutual advantage between Harvard and Dumbarton Oaks. Fourth, to serve the larger public through the museum, garden, and Friends of Music. Our wonderful garden and campus, which host unparalleled collections, are special and filled with diverse, energetic, and talented people who are driven to grow and succeed. By working here, you join a vibrant community that advances our mission in meaningful ways. Please visit our website: https://www.doaks.org/about/employment to view a complete listing of our current open positions.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum-of-indianapolis.jpeg
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dumbarton-oaks-research-library.jpeg
Dumbarton Oaks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dumbarton Oaks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Children's Museum of Indianapolis in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dumbarton Oaks in 2025.

Incident History — The Children's Museum of Indianapolis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dumbarton Oaks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dumbarton Oaks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum-of-indianapolis.jpeg
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dumbarton-oaks-research-library.jpeg
Dumbarton Oaks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dumbarton Oaks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dumbarton Oaks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company.

In the current year, Dumbarton Oaks company and The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dumbarton Oaks company nor The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dumbarton Oaks company nor The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dumbarton Oaks company nor The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company nor Dumbarton Oaks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company nor Dumbarton Oaks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company employs more people globally than Dumbarton Oaks company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor Dumbarton Oaks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X