Comparison Overview

Riverview Center for Growth

VS

Stella Nova Psychology, Inc.

Riverview Center for Growth

3995 Marcola Rd. , Springfield, OR, 97477, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

With a legacy dating back to 1971, formerly known as The Child Center, our commitment at Riverview Center for Growth is dedicated to serving Eugene, Springfield, and beyond remains steadfast. Our comprehensive services extend beyond professional mental health support and therapeutic education programs. Our goal is simple: to cultivate a space of safety, respect, validation, and encouragement. We're here for you 24/7, offering crisis support to all of Lane County. No matter where you are in life, we meet you there with empathy and unwavering support. If you or your child could benefit from drug and/or alcohol treatment, we collaborate with community organizations to tailor individualized co-treatment plans. But our support doesn't stop there. We provide wellness and peer support services, including a food pantry and clothing closet, available to all our clients. In addition to educational classes, we also have a weekly Growing Connections Parent Group: a family-led online Zoom gathering open to parents, guardians, and caregivers of Riverview. Embracing modern modalities such as EMDR and Neurofeedback therapy, we're constantly evolving to meet the diverse needs of our community. As a nonprofit agency, our mission remains centered on offering hope and fostering growth. Join us at our picturesque Riverview campus or connect with us in the community – together, we're making tangible differences in the lives of children, teens, adults, and families.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stella Nova Psychology, Inc.

2211 Post Street, San Francisco, California, 94115, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Stella Nova's mission is to support women and nonbinary professionals' mental health so they can succeed and thrive at work and at home. We offer individual, group, and couples therapy online for clients throughout California. Our clients are professionals of all ages and stages of their careers – from recent graduates just getting adjusted to their first full-time job, to women at the top of their game but looking for a change. Corporate ladder climbers, glass-ceiling smashers, creative badasses, academic smarty-pants, side hustlers, techies, working mamas, don’t-mind-me-I’m-just-saving-the-world types – and folks who are still just trying to figure it all out – we’re here for you.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-child-center.jpeg
Riverview Center for Growth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stella-nova-psychology-inc.jpeg
Stella Nova Psychology, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Riverview Center for Growth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stella Nova Psychology, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Riverview Center for Growth in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Riverview Center for Growth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Riverview Center for Growth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-child-center.jpeg
Riverview Center for Growth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stella-nova-psychology-inc.jpeg
Stella Nova Psychology, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Riverview Center for Growth company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Riverview Center for Growth company.

In the current year, Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company and Riverview Center for Growth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company nor Riverview Center for Growth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company nor Riverview Center for Growth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company nor Riverview Center for Growth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth company nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth company nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Riverview Center for Growth company employs more people globally than Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Riverview Center for Growth nor Stella Nova Psychology, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N