Comparison Overview

The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art

VS

Kuvera Partners

The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art

445 North Park Avenue, Winter Park, FL, 32789, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Morse Museum is home to the world’s most comprehensive collection of works by American designer and artist Louis Comfort Tiffany (1848–1933), including the chapel interior he designed for the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago and art and architectural objects from Tiffany’s celebrated Long Island home, Laurelton Hall. The Museum's holdings also include American art pottery, late 19th- and early 20th-century American painting, graphics, and decorative art. The Museum, founded as the Morse Gallery of Art on the Rollins College campus in 1942, opened at a location on Welbourne Avenue in Winter Park in February 1978 and at its current site on Park Avenue in July 1995. Two subsequent expansions of the Park Avenue galleries have increased exhibition space to almost 20,000 square feet, five times that at Welbourne. The Museum is owned and operated by the Charles Hosmer Morse Foundation and receives additional support from the Elizabeth Morse Genius Foundation. It receives no public funds.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kuvera Partners

6764 Hollywood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90028, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Kuvera Partners is a Los Angeles-based private corporation with nationwide interests in attractions, self-storage, and real estate. Since 1965, the company has built and operated businesses that are leaders in their industries and are socially-responsible within their communities. Kuvera's continuing success over three generations stems from its combination of solid entrepreneurial experience and a commitment to remaining on the leading edge. Always moving forward, the Partners are currently expanding existing brands and seeking to add businesses and properties that utilize their core competencies. Their investments and partnerships are not only based on returns, but also on integrity, personal commitment, and just plain fun!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-hosmer-morse-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kuvera-partners.jpeg
Kuvera Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kuvera Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kuvera Partners in 2025.

Incident History — The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kuvera Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kuvera Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-hosmer-morse-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kuvera-partners.jpeg
Kuvera Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kuvera Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kuvera Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company.

In the current year, Kuvera Partners company and The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kuvera Partners company nor The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kuvera Partners company nor The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kuvera Partners company nor The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company nor Kuvera Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kuvera Partners company.

The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art company employs more people globally than Kuvera Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum of American Art nor Kuvera Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X