Comparison Overview

Charles Dickens Museum

VS

The Children's Museum

Charles Dickens Museum

48Doughty St, London, Greater London WC1N 2LX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://dickensmuseum.com

Charles Dickens Museum holds one of the most important collections of Dickens ephemera in the world. The Museum is based at 48 Doughty Street in Charles Dickens’s only surviving London family home. Dickens lived in this house from 1837 until 1839 and wrote Oliver Twist and Nicholas Nickleby whilst living here. We offer visitors the chance to step back in time and experience Dickens’s home as if he had just stepped out the door.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Children's Museum

950 Troutbrook Drive, None, West Hartford, CT, US, 06119
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thechildrensmuseumct.org/

The Children’s Museum in West Hartford and Roaring Brook Nature Center in Canton are Connecticut’s premiere destinations for exploration and education. The Children's Museum Wildlife Sanctuary is home to more than 100 live rescued animals. Travelers Science Dome is CT's largest digital full dome planetarium, and fun with science and nature for the family or school group, scout group, and more. Great place for a birthday party for your favorite child. Free onsite parking, walking distance to West Hartford Center and Blue Back Square. Admission: $14.75 ages 13 and up, $13.75 for children age 2-12 and senior age 63+; free for under age 2. Join our email list for special offers and discounts! Open Tuesday - Saturday 9:00am-4:00pm, Sunday 11:00am-4:00pm. Open Mondays during the summer and on local school holidays.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum.jpeg
The Children's Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charles Dickens Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Children's Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Dickens Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Children's Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Charles Dickens Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Dickens Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum.jpeg
The Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Children's Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charles Dickens Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Children's Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charles Dickens Museum company.

In the current year, The Children's Museum company and Charles Dickens Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Children's Museum company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor The Children's Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor The Children's Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Children's Museum company employs more people globally than Charles Dickens Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor The Children's Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References