Comparison Overview

Charles Dickens Museum

VS

Military Heritage Museum

Charles Dickens Museum

48Doughty St, London, Greater London WC1N 2LX, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Charles Dickens Museum holds one of the most important collections of Dickens ephemera in the world. The Museum is based at 48 Doughty Street in Charles Dickens’s only surviving London family home. Dickens lived in this house from 1837 until 1839 and wrote Oliver Twist and Nicholas Nickleby whilst living here. We offer visitors the chance to step back in time and experience Dickens’s home as if he had just stepped out the door.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Military Heritage Museum

900 W Marion Ave, Punta Gorda, 33950, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Mission To promote an understanding of and respect for the rich military heritage of the United States and the sacrifices made by our country’s veterans, living and deceased, emphasizing that Freedom Isn’t Free. Vision To be Southwest Florida’s most treasured museum, a moving interactive journey through our nation’s military heritage and history, whereby all who come to discover and connect, leave inspired to remember and honor those who serve.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/military-heritage-museum.jpeg
Military Heritage Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charles Dickens Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Military Heritage Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Dickens Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Military Heritage Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Charles Dickens Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Dickens Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Military Heritage Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Military Heritage Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/military-heritage-museum.jpeg
Military Heritage Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Military Heritage Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charles Dickens Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Military Heritage Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charles Dickens Museum company.

In the current year, Military Heritage Museum company and Charles Dickens Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Military Heritage Museum company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Military Heritage Museum company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Military Heritage Museum company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor Military Heritage Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor Military Heritage Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charles Dickens Museum company employs more people globally than Military Heritage Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum nor Military Heritage Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H