Comparison Overview

The Châteauville Foundation

VS

BASE

The Châteauville Foundation

undefined, undefined, undefined, 22716, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The Châteauville Foundation was established at Castleton Farms in Rappahannock County, VA in 1997 by Lorin and Dietlinde Maazel. The Foundation’s mission is to nurture young artists, foster collaborative artistic enterprise and create opportunities within the community for shared cultural experience. The private, state-of-the-art Theatre House is the focal point of the Foundation’s activities, and home to its most far-reaching programs, The Castleton Residency and a new Festival, which will be inaugurated, along with a second intimate but highly flexible performance space, in July 2009.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BASE

rue Artan 144, Bruxelles, BE, 1030
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

compagnie de théâtre pour jeune public, basée à Bruxelles, active principalement en communauté française mais aussi en Flandre et à l'étranger. Plusieurs spectacles sont actuellement programmé: "Fenêtres", "Le cirque à trois pattes", et prochainement "Au pied du mur". Chacun de ces spectacles offre une part importante à la musique, tout en abordant des thèmes divers comme l'ouverture à la découverte et l'invitation à la rencontre, le respect de la différence, la curiosité en la vie et la confiance du lendemain, l'importance et la force de l'imaginaire, la transmission intergénérationnelle...

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 172
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ch-teauville-foundation.jpeg
The Châteauville Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
BASE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Châteauville Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BASE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Châteauville Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BASE in 2025.

Incident History — The Châteauville Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Châteauville Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BASE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BASE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ch-teauville-foundation.jpeg
The Châteauville Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
BASE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Châteauville Foundation company and BASE company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BASE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Châteauville Foundation company.

In the current year, BASE company and The Châteauville Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BASE company nor The Châteauville Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BASE company nor The Châteauville Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BASE company nor The Châteauville Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation company nor BASE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation company nor BASE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BASE company employs more people globally than The Châteauville Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Châteauville Foundation nor BASE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N