Comparison Overview

Center for Social Inclusion

VS

Latino Policy Forum

Center for Social Inclusion

150 Broadway, Suite 303, New York, NY, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Center for Social Inclusion's (CSI) mission is to catalyze communities, government, and other institutions to dismantle structural racial inequity. We craft and apply strategies and tools to transform our nation's policies and practices, in order to achieve racial equity. Our approach is organized into four strategies: POLICY & RESEARCH -- Working with community groups, government, and national organizations to develop policies that advance racial equity. TALKING ABOUT RACE -- Developing and sharing tools to talk about race and shift the dominant narrative. CAPACITY BUILDING -- Building leadership capacity through multi-racial coalition building, convenings, leadership development, and trainings. INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE -- Developing and implementing institutional change strategies to operationalize structural racial equity. Through our four strategies, CSI has developed programs to address racial inequities within specific issue areas and/or sectors. These programs include: - Government Alliance on Race and Equity - Energy Democracy - Food Equity - First Food - Broadband Equity - Transportation Equity - Race to Democracy - Communications Testing - Maya Wiley Fellowship Program - CSI Senior Fellowship

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Latino Policy Forum

17 N State St, Chicago, Illinois, 60602, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Latino Policy Forum provides analysis with a Latino Perspective and convenes sectors of the community to engage in the policy debate and advocacy activities on issues critical to the region. Our work currently focuses on early childhood education, housing issues that address affordability, accessibility and equity, and immigration reform which supports the integration of immigrants into the social, economic, and political fabric of the U.S.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latino-policy-forum.jpeg
Latino Policy Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Social Inclusion
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Latino Policy Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Social Inclusion in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Latino Policy Forum in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Social Inclusion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Social Inclusion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Latino Policy Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Latino Policy Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-center-for-social-inclusion.jpeg
Center for Social Inclusion
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latino-policy-forum.jpeg
Latino Policy Forum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center for Social Inclusion company and Latino Policy Forum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Latino Policy Forum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Social Inclusion company.

In the current year, Latino Policy Forum company and Center for Social Inclusion company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Latino Policy Forum company nor Center for Social Inclusion company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Latino Policy Forum company nor Center for Social Inclusion company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Latino Policy Forum company nor Center for Social Inclusion company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion company nor Latino Policy Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion company nor Latino Policy Forum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Latino Policy Forum company employs more people globally than Center for Social Inclusion company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Social Inclusion nor Latino Policy Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H