Comparison Overview

the Cape Bar

VS

The Sayer Law Group, P.C.

the Cape Bar

40 Queen Victoria Street, Cape Town, 8001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Cape Bar is dedicated to promoting access to justice for all, to ensuring that the members of the Cape Bar render the highest standard of legal services and is committed to changing the composition of the Cape Bar's membership so as to be representative of South African society, and to that end, encourages fair and equitable briefing patterns.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Sayer Law Group, P.C.

925 E. 4th Street Waterloo, Iowa, Waterloo, Iowa, 50703, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Sayer Law Group, P.C. is a nationally recognized, multi-state legal service provider, with a focus on areas such as foreclosure, creditor's bankruptcy rights, and civil litigation. We service clients in Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Iowa, Idaho, Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The firm's headquarters are located in Waterloo, Iowa. We are committed to meeting the diverse needs and challenges of our clients. Success for the firm is client satisfaction - nothing more, nothing less. The Sayer Law Group, P.C. takes its client relationships extremely seriously and looks forward to working with you to successfully address your legal challenges and concerns.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-cape-bar.jpeg
the Cape Bar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sayer-law-group-p.c..jpeg
The Sayer Law Group, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
the Cape Bar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Sayer Law Group, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for the Cape Bar in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Sayer Law Group, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — the Cape Bar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

the Cape Bar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Sayer Law Group, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Sayer Law Group, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-cape-bar.jpeg
the Cape Bar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sayer-law-group-p.c..jpeg
The Sayer Law Group, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both the Cape Bar company and The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to the Cape Bar company.

In the current year, The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company and the Cape Bar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company nor the Cape Bar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company nor the Cape Bar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company nor the Cape Bar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither the Cape Bar company nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither the Cape Bar company nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

the Cape Bar company employs more people globally than The Sayer Law Group, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither the Cape Bar nor The Sayer Law Group, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X