Comparison Overview

Camden Center

VS

CHOICE of NY

Camden Center

10780 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.camdencenter.com

Since its establishment, Camden Center has been bringing a new standard of premium care to those with mental health and addictive disorders. As a medical organization with a staff of nationally recognized physicians and therapists, we are equipped to treat a wide array of conditions and manage highly complex cases. Camden Center offers an integrative, multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of mental health and addictive disorders that matches each patient with a personalized team of expert clinicians.  No two patients have the same treatment team, and each patient’s program is designed specifically for them based upon a thorough diagnostic evaluation and ongoing assessments of progress.  Through a combination of psychotherapy, integrative medicine, psychopharmacology, nutrition, and coaching, patients build a foundation for lasting recovery, functionality, and happiness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CHOICE of NY

71 North Avenue, New Rochelle, NY, 10801, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://choiceofny.org/

CHOICE is a leading Care Management Agency serving Westchester County. We are a peer agency that assists consumers of mental health services to receive vital benefits to which they are entitled. We help our clients to find housing, obtain Medicaid, Food Stamps, Social Security benefits, become job ready, and locate a variety of other programs that they need. Our services are 100% free of charge to clients as they are covered either by Medicaid or grant funding. We focus on tangible health outcomes such as reducing emergency room visits and inpatient hospital stays. We do this by providing personalized care management to assist in obtaining and maintaining comprehensive, preventative medical care (e.g. appointment scheduling, reminders and appointment escorts) as well as addressing psycho-social needs that might interfere with medical care. At the end of our time together, we will have successfully helped someone back to a place in life where they are positive contributors in their community. Most importantly, we do so without judgment and with compassion. We change lives, we save lives and we help people regain the dignity they deserve.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-camden-center.jpeg
Camden Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/choice-of-ny.jpeg
CHOICE of NY
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Camden Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CHOICE of NY
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camden Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHOICE of NY in 2026.

Incident History — Camden Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camden Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CHOICE of NY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHOICE of NY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-camden-center.jpeg
Camden Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/choice-of-ny.jpeg
CHOICE of NY
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Camden Center company and CHOICE of NY company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CHOICE of NY company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Camden Center company.

In the current year, CHOICE of NY company and Camden Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CHOICE of NY company nor Camden Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CHOICE of NY company nor Camden Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CHOICE of NY company nor Camden Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Camden Center company nor CHOICE of NY company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Camden Center company nor CHOICE of NY company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Camden Center company employs more people globally than CHOICE of NY company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Camden Center nor CHOICE of NY holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References