Comparison Overview

The Business Year

VS

Bloodstone Studios

The Business Year

None, None, Dubai, None, AE, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Business Year is a global media group that has been providing investors, businesses, and governments with first-hand insights into the world’s most dynamic markets for over a decade. We conduct hundreds of interviews a week with top decision makers in the Middle East, Latin America, Central and Southeast Asia, Africa, and Europe. Our content is available in printed reports and across an array of digital platforms at www.thebusinessyear.com/shop

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bloodstone Studios

undefined, Las Vegas, NV, 89101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Bloodstone Studios is an independent publishing and production company that creates strange and interesting works of the Occult. Our flagship products are our Tarot decks: The Demon-Possessed Tarot and the Angel-Evoking Tarot. Additionally, we publish limited edition, one-of-a-kind books of ancient magical lore: The Grimoire of Dark Souls and the Angenomicon. These two books contain authentic magic spells and symbols dating to the 1500s that was previously lost to history. A small company, Bloodstone Studios has a staff of seven, and our headquarters is located in beautiful Beverly Hills, California.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-business-year.jpeg
The Business Year
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloodstone-studios.jpeg
Bloodstone Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Business Year
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bloodstone Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Business Year in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bloodstone Studios in 2025.

Incident History — The Business Year (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Business Year cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bloodstone Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bloodstone Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-business-year.jpeg
The Business Year
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloodstone-studios.jpeg
Bloodstone Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Business Year company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bloodstone Studios company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bloodstone Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Business Year company.

In the current year, Bloodstone Studios company and The Business Year company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bloodstone Studios company nor The Business Year company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bloodstone Studios company nor The Business Year company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bloodstone Studios company nor The Business Year company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Business Year company nor Bloodstone Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Business Year company nor Bloodstone Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Business Year company employs more people globally than Bloodstone Studios company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Business Year nor Bloodstone Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.