Comparison Overview

The Business Journals secondary page

VS

Boston Art Review

The Business Journals secondary page

120 West Morehead Street, Charlotte, 28202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://thebusinessjournals.com

The Business Journals are the premier media solutions platform for companies strategically targeting business decision makers. We deliver a total business audience of over 10 million people via our 42 websites, 63 publications and over 700 annual industry leading events. Our media products provide comprehensive coverage of business news from a local, regional and national perspective. We have more people, publications and websites covering our nation’s business than any other business media organization. The Business Journals are a division American City Business Journals.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Boston Art Review

551 Tremont St, Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://bostonartreview.com/

Founded in October of 2017, Boston Art Review (BAR) is an independent publication committed to facilitating active discourse around contemporary art in Boston. Boston Art Review’s engagement in the community fosters inter-institutional collaboration. BAR actively fosters the work of both emerging and established artists, writers, critics, curators, and scholars and is committed to uplifting the work of underrepresented individuals and communities. Consisting of an online and print publication, Boston Art Review is focused on publishing multidisciplinary content. Boston Art Review provides a space for critical perspectives, interviews, reviews, artist projects, and collective initiatives. Through our website, newsletter, social media, events, and print publication, Boston Art Review stands as an accessible, go-to guide for contemporary art in Boston. The publication seeks to foster inter-institutional and city-wide discourse that attempts to break down silos. As we continue to bridge the gaps between coverage, criticism, and community engagement, we are careful not to create a sense of cultural homogeneity. Rather, we seek to elevate and give voice to individuals, perspectives, and subcultures under the umbrella of contemporary art and culture in Boston and beyond.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-business-journals.jpeg
The Business Journals secondary page
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-art-review.jpeg
Boston Art Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Business Journals secondary page
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Art Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Business Journals secondary page in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Art Review in 2025.

Incident History — The Business Journals secondary page (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Business Journals secondary page cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Art Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Art Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-business-journals.jpeg
The Business Journals secondary page
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-art-review.jpeg
Boston Art Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Business Journals secondary page company and Boston Art Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Boston Art Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Business Journals secondary page company.

In the current year, Boston Art Review company and The Business Journals secondary page company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boston Art Review company nor The Business Journals secondary page company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boston Art Review company nor The Business Journals secondary page company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Art Review company nor The Business Journals secondary page company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page company nor Boston Art Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page company nor Boston Art Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Business Journals secondary page company employs more people globally than Boston Art Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Business Journals secondary page nor Boston Art Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References