Comparison Overview

The Burlesque Hall of Fame

VS

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa

The Burlesque Hall of Fame

1027 S Main St, Las Vegas, 89101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Burlesque Hall of Fame is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization. Our mission is to establish a permanent, first-rate tourist attraction and research/exhibition space for our unique collection, in hopes of inspiring, educating and entertaining the public and fostering an appreciation for the unique history and heritage of American Burlesque; including but not limited to the art, artifacts and personal histories of the art’s biggest names and brightest stars.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa

55 Cable Street, Wellington, NZ
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Te Papa is New Zealand’s national museum, renowned for being bicultural, scholarly, innovative, and fun. Our success is built on our relationships with and ability to represent our community. Our collections span five areas: Art, History, Pacific, Māori, and Natural Environment. Our exhibitions are interdisciplinary and interactive, and we have dynamic events and education programmes. We also have thriving commercial enterprises, including a publishing division, conference operations, and retail stores.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 437
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-burlesque-hall-of-fame.jpeg
The Burlesque Hall of Fame
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-new-zealand-te-papa-tongarewa.jpeg
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Burlesque Hall of Fame
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Burlesque Hall of Fame in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa in 2026.

Incident History — The Burlesque Hall of Fame (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Burlesque Hall of Fame cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-burlesque-hall-of-fame.jpeg
The Burlesque Hall of Fame
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-new-zealand-te-papa-tongarewa.jpeg
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Burlesque Hall of Fame company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Burlesque Hall of Fame company.

In the current year, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company and The Burlesque Hall of Fame company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company nor The Burlesque Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company nor The Burlesque Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company nor The Burlesque Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame company nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame company nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company employs more people globally than The Burlesque Hall of Fame company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H