Comparison Overview

The Burlesque Hall of Fame

VS

Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami

The Burlesque Hall of Fame

1027 S Main St, Las Vegas, 89101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burlesquehall.com

The Burlesque Hall of Fame is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization. Our mission is to establish a permanent, first-rate tourist attraction and research/exhibition space for our unique collection, in hopes of inspiring, educating and entertaining the public and fostering an appreciation for the unique history and heritage of American Burlesque; including but not limited to the art, artifacts and personal histories of the art’s biggest names and brightest stars.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami

61 NE 41 St, Miami, FL, 33137, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://icamiami.org

The Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami (ICA Miami) is dedicated to promoting continuous experimentation in contemporary art, advancing new scholarship, and fostering the exchange of art and ideas throughout the Miami region and internationally. Through an energetic calendar of exhibitions and programs, and its collection, ICA Miami provides an important international platform for the work of local, emerging, and under-recognized artists, and advances the public appreciation and understanding of the most innovative art of our time. The museum is deeply committed to providing open, public access to artistic excellence by offering year-round free admission.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-burlesque-hall-of-fame.jpeg
The Burlesque Hall of Fame
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icamiami.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Burlesque Hall of Fame
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Burlesque Hall of Fame in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami in 2026.

Incident History — The Burlesque Hall of Fame (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Burlesque Hall of Fame cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-burlesque-hall-of-fame.jpeg
The Burlesque Hall of Fame
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icamiami.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Burlesque Hall of Fame company and Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Burlesque Hall of Fame company.

In the current year, Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company and The Burlesque Hall of Fame company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company nor The Burlesque Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company nor The Burlesque Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company nor The Burlesque Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame company nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame company nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami company employs more people globally than The Burlesque Hall of Fame company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Burlesque Hall of Fame nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Miami holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References