Comparison Overview

The Bureau

VS

IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.)

The Bureau

3400 Technology Drive, Minneapolis, MN, 55418, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At The Bureau, we stand ready to meet your increased demands of both service and quality. Our goal remains one of providing you with the best possible product to guarantee that your advertising dollar is well placed with us. Our efforts of continuous improvement in technology, procedures and most importantly our people will assure our ongoing success in accomplishing these goals. Take a look around our website and see how our people, process and technology are enabling our customers to get more out of their print.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.)

Industrial InkJet Ltd, Swavesey, Cambridgeshire, CB24 4AE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We are leading experts in industrial inkjet design and technology. We understand different applications and know how to get the required results with inkjet printing by working with our customers, tailoring our products to provide complete solutions for the successful implementation of inkjet technology into a production environment. We have systems for monochrome, colour, white, spot colour and varnish as well as security inks. We know how to make reliable inkjet systems that work all day, every day. In addition, we provide sales and technical support for Konica Minolta inkjet components, and manufacture and supply a range of starter kits and inkjet peripherals. These allow our customers to complete development quickly and efficiently with no wasted time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bureau.jpeg
The Bureau
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-inkjet-ltd.jpeg
IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bureau
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bureau in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) in 2025.

Incident History — The Bureau (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bureau cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bureau.jpeg
The Bureau
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-inkjet-ltd.jpeg
IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bureau company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bureau company.

In the current year, IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company and The Bureau company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company nor The Bureau company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company nor The Bureau company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company nor The Bureau company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bureau company nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Bureau company.

The Bureau company employs more people globally than IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bureau nor IIJ (Industrial Inkjet Ltd.) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N