Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
โ† Back to The British Museum company page

The British Museum Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STATHETHE1769181734)

The Rankiteo video explains how the company The British Museum has been impacted by a Cyber Attack on the date June 16, 2022.

newsone

Incident Summary

Rankiteo Incident Impact
-27
Company Score Before Incident
775 / 1000
Company Score After Incident
748 / 1000
Company Link
Incident ID
STATHETHE1769181734
Type of Cyber Incident
Cyber Attack
Primary Vector
NA
Data Exposed
NA
First Detected by Rankiteo
June 16, 2022
Last Updated Score

If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.

newsone

Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of The British Museum's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteoโ€™s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts The British Museum Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteoโ€™s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
newsone

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the The British Museum breach identified under incident ID STATHETHE1769181734.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of The British Museum's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-british-museum, the number of followers: 208838, the industry type: Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos and the number of employees: 1278 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 775 and after the incident was 748 with a difference of -27 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on The British Museum and their customers.

On 20 October 2023, Dresden State Art Collections (SKD) disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Cyberattack Disrupts Germanyโ€™s Dresden State Art Collections".

Germanyโ€™s Dresden State Art Collections (SKD), one of Europeโ€™s oldest and most prestigious museum networks, has fallen victim to a targeted cyberattack, severely disrupting its digital operations.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting online ticket sales, visitor services and museum shop.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Pre-purchased tickets remain valid; museums remain open to the public.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including severely disrupting its digital operations, and online ticket sales...crippled and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including visitor services and museum shop disrupted, and digital operations impacted. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Service Stop (T1489) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating online ticket sales, visitor services, and museum shop crippled and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating digital operations severely disrupted. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), with evidence including targeted cyberattack, and attackers identities or motives not disclosed. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating security systems protecting the collections unaffected. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

newsone

Sources