Comparison Overview

The Bridges Network

VS

NJ Center for the Healing Arts

The Bridges Network

656 W Gurley St., Prescott, Arizona, 86305, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://thebridgesnetwork.com

The Bridges Network is a Licensed Drug and Alcohol Treatment Center. Our program is designed to provide the best possible substance abuse treatment and community for individuals suffering from drug addiction and alcoholism. Our clinical staff is highly skilled, composed of licensed therapists and treatment professionals. Our Program is focused around Individual Therapy, Group Therapy, Family Therapy, Relapse Prevention, Addiction Education, Neurofeedback, and Drug Screening. Beyond therapy, we advocate lifelong 12 Step commitment.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NJ Center for the Healing Arts

248 Broad Street, Red Bank, NJ, 07701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.njcha.org

The NJ Center was established in 1989 and it considered to be one of the first outpatient Integrative Mental Health Centers in the country. It offers a model of patient-centered whole-person care. Services include counseling, therapy (for people of all ages), tele-therapy and creative expressive arts, as well as complementary and alternative medicine (chiropractic, massage, mindfulness, hypnotherapy). "NJCHA" also offers events to build community such as art exhibits, concerts, coffee houses, workshops, and retreats.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridges-network.jpeg
The Bridges Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nj-center-for-the-healing-arts.jpeg
NJ Center for the Healing Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bridges Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NJ Center for the Healing Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bridges Network in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NJ Center for the Healing Arts in 2026.

Incident History — The Bridges Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bridges Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NJ Center for the Healing Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NJ Center for the Healing Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridges-network.jpeg
The Bridges Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nj-center-for-the-healing-arts.jpeg
NJ Center for the Healing Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bridges Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NJ Center for the Healing Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NJ Center for the Healing Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bridges Network company.

In the current year, NJ Center for the Healing Arts company and The Bridges Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NJ Center for the Healing Arts company nor The Bridges Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NJ Center for the Healing Arts company nor The Bridges Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NJ Center for the Healing Arts company nor The Bridges Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bridges Network company nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Bridges Network company nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NJ Center for the Healing Arts company employs more people globally than The Bridges Network company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bridges Network nor NJ Center for the Healing Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References