Comparison Overview

The Bridge

VS

Luminance Recovery

The Bridge

248 W. 108th Street, New York, NY, 10025, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1954, The Bridge is a non profit 501 (c) (3) organization that has developed into one of New York City’s premier rehabilitation agencies. The Bridge provides mental health and substance abuse treatment, housing, vocational training and job placement, healthcare, education and creative arts therapy to 2,300 men and women in Manhattan, The Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens. A leader and innovator, The Bridge offers the highest quality services and continues to develop model programs that have been replicated nationally and internationally.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 569
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Luminance Recovery

27131 Calle Arroyo`​, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, US
Last Update:

Luminance is about creating lasting change in the lives of those who are ready to embark. What makes Luminance different is their mentality and a genuine passion for helping people create a culture of innovation, excellence and a different mentality about helping those who suffer from addiction. That passion fuels every decision made at Luminance. That passion is the reason they don’t take the easy route. Luminance recognizes their responsibility to do everything to help their clients on their path to recovery. They go the extra mile with even the smallest of accommodations. Our biggest differentiators are our people, our method, innovation and our outcomes. Luminance invests in long-term solutions that treat both the Acute and Chronic symptoms of addiction. Instead of helping them get sober, Luminance teaches clients how to stay sober so they can enjoy lives filled with happiness, global health, and well-being.  Our ability to treat our client’s acute and chronic addictive symptoms with individualized, holistic, treatment plans promotes a deeper level of connection, trust, and healing. Luminance uses a phased approach to treatment that allows clients to advance through treatment at a pace based on their specific situation and clinical milestones. Luminance customizes each client’s treatment plan which then gets implemented by the clinical team. The client treatment team will be made up of dedicated professionals from various disciplines such as: • Psychology • Addiction counseling • Behavioral health • Medicine • Nutrition • Health and wellness • Spirituality The team will talk extensively with the patient and their family and perform several different evaluations, then design an individual treatment plan based on substance abuse history, and other factors, including any co-occurring addictions, disorders, or other problems. They collaborate daily to ensure that every man and woman is progressing as they should in treatment.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridge-inc-_2.jpeg
The Bridge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luminance-recovery.jpeg
Luminance Recovery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bridge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Luminance Recovery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bridge in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luminance Recovery in 2026.

Incident History — The Bridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Luminance Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luminance Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridge-inc-_2.jpeg
The Bridge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luminance-recovery.jpeg
Luminance Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bridge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Luminance Recovery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Luminance Recovery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bridge company.

In the current year, Luminance Recovery company and The Bridge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Luminance Recovery company nor The Bridge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Luminance Recovery company nor The Bridge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Luminance Recovery company nor The Bridge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bridge company nor Luminance Recovery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Bridge company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Luminance Recovery company.

The Bridge company employs more people globally than Luminance Recovery company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bridge nor Luminance Recovery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N