Comparison Overview

The Bridge Foundation Bristol

VS

Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc.

The Bridge Foundation Bristol

13 Sydenham Road, Bristol, BS6 5SH, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Bridge Foundation has provided in-depth therapeutic expertise to over 11,000 individuals in Bristol and the Southwest since 1983. Leaders in child and family mental health, we specialise in providing in-depth psychotherapeutic support, to make a difference to children, young people, and adults who are suffering mental health difficulties. Our multidisciplinary team is equipped to support the mental health of individuals from all backgrounds and experiences. The Bridge Foundation was founded by Sally Box, a psychoanalytic psychotherapist trained at the Tavistock Clinic who had the vision of applying a psychoanalytic approach to understanding issues of everyday life, groups, and organisations. Today, our focus is on providing high quality therapy to children, families, couples, and adults suffering from mental health difficulties. We are a registered charity, and we provide our services in two main ways: Bridge in Schools – embedding highly qualified therapists in local schools in areas of deprivation to provide support to vulnerable and at-risk children. Bridge Psychotherapy Service – providing a not-for-profit 1:1 therapy service for children, adolescents, families and adults. We believe everyone deserves to feel secure and supported in their mental health. Our highly trained therapists provide a safe space for individuals from all backgrounds and experiences.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc.

4654 Haygood Road, Suite B, Virginia Beach, VA, 23455, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Conveniently located in the Haygood Road area of Virginia Beach and only a few minutes from Town Center, we are dedicated to providing Hampton Roads with high-quality outpatient behavioral health and wellness services. Our core specialties include outpatient psychotherapy and substance abuse treatment for consumers of all ages. We offer these in individual, family and group therapy settings to address a host of mental disorders including, anxiety, depression, bi-polar disorder, PTSD and alcohol dependency. In some cases, our clients will benefit from a single type of treatment approach while others will need a combination. We refer to these as modalities. Our licensed clinicians are skilled at listening, understanding and treating a host of mental disorders. They are trained to develop treatment plans by applying concepts from some of the most well-known psychological "schools of thought". These include cognitive behavioral, dialectal behavioral, psychoanalysis, mindfulness, milieu and EMDR. Healthy Mind, Body, and Spirit To reduce stress, we supplement our traditional treatments with holistic therapies such as therapeutic yoga, massage, and light exercise. For example, meditation can be used to clear the mind and bring it to a state of restfulness. To reinforce healthy habits, we offer wellness classes, workshops, and life coaching. We even offer tutoring classes for students that wish to improve their learning ability and to prepare themselves for important standardized tests. Our purpose is to help our clients obtain measurable improvements towards recovery and cope with life's struggles in healthy ways. How To Get Started Recovery begins with a simple phone call. Set an appointment for an initial assessment. Our staff is always compassionate, courteous and professional. Give us a call today at (757) 431-7321. We can help.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridge-foundation-bristol.jpeg
The Bridge Foundation Bristol
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunrise-behavioral-health-inc-.jpeg
Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bridge Foundation Bristol
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bridge Foundation Bristol in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — The Bridge Foundation Bristol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bridge Foundation Bristol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridge-foundation-bristol.jpeg
The Bridge Foundation Bristol
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sunrise-behavioral-health-inc-.jpeg
Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Bridge Foundation Bristol company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bridge Foundation Bristol company.

In the current year, Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company and The Bridge Foundation Bristol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company nor The Bridge Foundation Bristol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company nor The Bridge Foundation Bristol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company nor The Bridge Foundation Bristol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol company nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol company nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Bridge Foundation Bristol company employs more people globally than Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bridge Foundation Bristol nor Sunrise Behavioral Health Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N