Comparison Overview

The Black Hawk Casino

VS

Paf - Games Sport Casino

The Black Hawk Casino

42008 Westech Road , Shawnee, Oklahoma, 74804, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At The Black Hawk Casino, our goal is a rather simple one, to have the friendliest, most helpful staff, and to provide our customers with a best in class gaming experience. We are constantly looking for new ways to improve our customer’s experience. In the past two years alone, we have completely remodeled the exterior of our facility, installed new carpet, dramatically upgraded our heating and cooling system, and added a state-of-the-art smoke filtration system.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Paf - Games Sport Casino

Lövdalsvägen 8, Mariehamn, Åland, AX-22101, FI
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Paf is a Nordic gaming company founded on Åland in 1966 to generate funds for the benefit of society. We were one of the very first gaming companies to go online in 1999. Many of our games are exclusive to Paf and developed by our in-house Games Studio. We are an award-winning industry leader in responsible gaming. Our physical gaming operations include over 30 cruise ships criss-crossing the Baltic and North Seas. Paf has roughly 350 employees representing over 30 nationalities. Our offices are located on Åland, in Helsinki, Stockholm, Riga, Tallinn, Oslo, Norrköping, Gzira and Madrid. Paf (Ålands Penningautomatförening) is licensed and controlled by the Government of Åland. In 2022, the Paf Group had a total turnover of 165.7 million euros and a profit of 44.4 million euros. More information at aboutpaf.com

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 428
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-black-hawk-casino.jpeg
The Black Hawk Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paf.jpeg
Paf - Games Sport Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Black Hawk Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paf - Games Sport Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Black Hawk Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paf - Games Sport Casino in 2025.

Incident History — The Black Hawk Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Black Hawk Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paf - Games Sport Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paf - Games Sport Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-black-hawk-casino.jpeg
The Black Hawk Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paf.jpeg
Paf - Games Sport Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Black Hawk Casino company and Paf - Games Sport Casino company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Paf - Games Sport Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Black Hawk Casino company.

In the current year, Paf - Games Sport Casino company and The Black Hawk Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paf - Games Sport Casino company nor The Black Hawk Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paf - Games Sport Casino company nor The Black Hawk Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paf - Games Sport Casino company nor The Black Hawk Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino company nor Paf - Games Sport Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino company nor Paf - Games Sport Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paf - Games Sport Casino company employs more people globally than The Black Hawk Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Black Hawk Casino nor Paf - Games Sport Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H