Comparison Overview

The Bar Standards Board

VS

Georgia Public Policy Foundation

The Bar Standards Board

289-293 High Holborn, London, GB, WC1V 7HZ
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) regulates barristers and specialised legal services businesses in England and Wales in the public interest. If you wish to communicate with the BSB, please email us at [email protected] or refer to our website https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/for-the-public/reporting-concerns.html if you wish to report a concern about a barrister. Reports concerning barristers and requests for waivers and authorisations are dealt with in confidence and it is not therefore our policy to respond to messages sent via social media (Facebook Messenger, LinkedIn or Twitter/X).

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 181
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Georgia Public Policy Foundation

3200 Cobb Galleria Parkway, Atlanta, GA, 30339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.georgiapolicy.org

Changing Georgia Policy, Changing Georgians’ Lives – Since 1991 The Georgia Public Policy Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, nonpartisan research institute. Our mission is to improve the lives of Georgians through public policies that enhance economic opportunity and freedom. We believe good public policy is based upon fact, an understanding of sound economic principles and the core principles of our free enterprise system – economic freedom, limited government, personal responsibility, individual initiative, respect for private property and the rule of law. Since 1991, the Georgia Public Policy Foundation has conducted scholarly research and analysis of state public policy issues and worked to educate citizens, policy-makers and the media. The Foundation is state-focused, independent, non-partisan and market-oriented in its approach. The Foundation hosts more than a dozen events each year throughout the state that allow members to meet and discuss issues with political, education, media and business leaders. Past speakers include the President of the United States, U.S. Speaker of the House, Supreme Court Justices, U.S. senators, representatives, presidential candidates, ambassadors, state officials, governors, members of the national media and area business leaders.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bar-standards-board.jpeg
The Bar Standards Board
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-public-policy-foundation.jpeg
Georgia Public Policy Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bar Standards Board
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgia Public Policy Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bar Standards Board in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia Public Policy Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — The Bar Standards Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bar Standards Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgia Public Policy Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia Public Policy Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bar-standards-board.jpeg
The Bar Standards Board
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-public-policy-foundation.jpeg
Georgia Public Policy Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bar Standards Board company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Georgia Public Policy Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Georgia Public Policy Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bar Standards Board company.

In the current year, Georgia Public Policy Foundation company and The Bar Standards Board company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgia Public Policy Foundation company nor The Bar Standards Board company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Georgia Public Policy Foundation company nor The Bar Standards Board company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Georgia Public Policy Foundation company nor The Bar Standards Board company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bar Standards Board company nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Bar Standards Board company nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Bar Standards Board company employs more people globally than Georgia Public Policy Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bar Standards Board nor Georgia Public Policy Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References