Comparison Overview

AAA-The Auto Club Group

VS

Intact

AAA-The Auto Club Group

1 Auto Club Drive, Dearborn, MI, US, 48126
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

AAA - The Auto Club Group (ACG) is the second largest AAA club in North America, serving more than 13+ million members across 14 U.S. states, the province of Quebec, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. For over 100 years, AAA has provided safety, security, and peace of mind. ACG advances AAA’s mission by providing a full suite of products and services to millions of AAA Members, from roadside assistance to insurance to travel support. We pride ourselves on always being there when you need us, delivering the highest level of customer service and value to each and every member. We seek to be a trusted ally—on the road and throughout life’s journey. AAA - The Auto Club Group belongs to the national AAA Federation, which is committed to improving the lives of our combined 60 million members across North America.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,727
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5G 0A1
Last Update: 2025-11-20

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour aider les gens, les entreprises et la société à aller de l’avant dans les bons moments et à être résilients dans le moments difficiles. Notre entreprise est basée sur des valeurs et la conviction que l’assurance doit d’abord s’intéresser aux personnes, et non aux choses. C’est dans cette optique que nous avons bâti Intact et ça se reflète chaque jour dans notre raison d’être, nos valeurs, nos facteurs de succès en leadership, notre promesse aux employés, nos objectifs et notre stratégie.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 20,361
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-auto-club-group.jpeg
AAA-The Auto Club Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intact.jpeg
Intact
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AAA-The Auto Club Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intact
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AAA-The Auto Club Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2025.

Incident History — AAA-The Auto Club Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AAA-The Auto Club Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-auto-club-group.jpeg
AAA-The Auto Club Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intact.jpeg
Intact
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Intact company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AAA-The Auto Club Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AAA-The Auto Club Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Intact company has not reported any.

In the current year, Intact company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Intact company nor AAA-The Auto Club Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AAA-The Auto Club Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Intact company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Intact company nor AAA-The Auto Club Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group company nor Intact company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intact company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AAA-The Auto Club Group company.

Intact company employs more people globally than AAA-The Auto Club Group company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor Intact holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H