Comparison Overview

AAA-The Auto Club Group

VS

IAG

AAA-The Auto Club Group

1 Auto Club Drive, Dearborn, MI, US, 48126
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

AAA - The Auto Club Group (ACG) is the second largest AAA club in North America, serving more than 13+ million members across 14 U.S. states, the province of Quebec, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. For over 100 years, AAA has provided safety, security, and peace of mind. ACG advances AAA’s mission by providing a full suite of products and services to millions of AAA Members, from roadside assistance to insurance to travel support. We pride ourselves on always being there when you need us, delivering the highest level of customer service and value to each and every member. We seek to be a trusted ally—on the road and throughout life’s journey. AAA - The Auto Club Group belongs to the national AAA Federation, which is committed to improving the lives of our combined 60 million members across North America.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,727
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

IAG

201 Sussex St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

IAG is Australia and New Zealand's largest general insurance company with a purpose to make your world a safer place, whether you are a customer, partner, employee, shareholder or part of the communities IAG serves across Australia and New Zealand. Our businesses have helped people recover from natural disasters, accidents and loss since 1851. In Australia and New Zealand we provide insurance under many leading brands, including NRMA Insurance, CGU, SGIO, SGIC and WFI; and NZI, State, AMI and Lumley Insurance (New Zealand). We also have interests in general insurance joint ventures in Malaysia and India. Increasingly, we see our role extending beyond paying claims to increasing awareness of risk, and helping communities reduce and prevent risk. We believe it is our responsibility as an industry leader to use our influence and role as a major investor, purchaser and employer for the good of everyone. For further information please visit www.iag.com.au.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 12,323
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-auto-club-group.jpeg
AAA-The Auto Club Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iag.jpeg
IAG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AAA-The Auto Club Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IAG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AAA-The Auto Club Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IAG in 2025.

Incident History — AAA-The Auto Club Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AAA-The Auto Club Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-auto-club-group.jpeg
AAA-The Auto Club Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iag.jpeg
IAG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IAG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AAA-The Auto Club Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AAA-The Auto Club Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IAG company has not reported any.

In the current year, IAG company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IAG company nor AAA-The Auto Club Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AAA-The Auto Club Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other IAG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IAG company nor AAA-The Auto Club Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group company nor IAG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IAG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AAA-The Auto Club Group company.

IAG company employs more people globally than AAA-The Auto Club Group company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AAA-The Auto Club Group nor IAG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H