Comparison Overview

Association of Service Dog Providers

VS

ASHA International

Association of Service Dog Providers

2200 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, 22201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.servicedogs4vets.org

The Association of Service Dog Providers for Military Veterans is a coalition of non-profit service dog providers for military Veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress, traumatic brain injury and military sexual trauma working to prevent suicide and improve military Veterans’ mental health. Our goal is to ensure that best practices are utilized by qualified organizations to ensure that Veterans are paired with the most beneficial service dogs; increase awareness and understanding of the medical evidence that supports the use of service dogs; and advocate for the expanded use of qualified service dogs.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ASHA International

P.O. Box 91232, Portland, 97291, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.myasha.org

ASHA International's mission is to promote personal, organizational, and community wellness through mental health education, training, and support. Please join us in our mission. Together we can promote mental health awareness, hope, and holistic wellness. ASHA International is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Specialties Mental health and holistic wellness, Cross-cultural issues in mental health, Mental health education, Mental health advocacy.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-association-of-service-dog-providers-for-military-veterans.jpeg
Association of Service Dog Providers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asha-international.jpeg
ASHA International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association of Service Dog Providers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ASHA International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association of Service Dog Providers in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASHA International in 2026.

Incident History — Association of Service Dog Providers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association of Service Dog Providers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ASHA International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASHA International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-association-of-service-dog-providers-for-military-veterans.jpeg
Association of Service Dog Providers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asha-international.jpeg
ASHA International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ASHA International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Association of Service Dog Providers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ASHA International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Association of Service Dog Providers company.

In the current year, ASHA International company and Association of Service Dog Providers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ASHA International company nor Association of Service Dog Providers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ASHA International company nor Association of Service Dog Providers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ASHA International company nor Association of Service Dog Providers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers company nor ASHA International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers company nor ASHA International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ASHA International company employs more people globally than Association of Service Dog Providers company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association of Service Dog Providers nor ASHA International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References