Comparison Overview

Aspen Hope Center

VS

Tancell Care

Aspen Hope Center

undefined, Basalt, CO, 81621, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aspenhopecenter.org

Aspen Hope Center was established in June 2010 to meet the unmet mental health needs in Aspen and the Roaring Fork Valley. Those gaps in service were identified in a comprehensive study conducted by the University of Colorado Denver Depression Center in 2009. Aspen Hope Center has two teams covering from Aspen to Parachute, Colorado 24 hours/day, offering crisis services for those in emotional crisis and offering a continuum of comprehensive care.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tancell Care

1500 E Tropicana Ave , Las Vegas, NV, 89119-8325, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tancellcare.com

Tancell Care serves participants with developmental disabilities in Southern and Northern Nevada through their services and programs. Tancell Care operates supportive living arrangements as well as a program that serves people with developmental disabilities living in their own residences. We define developmental disabilities as any significant disability arising before adulthood and which is expected to continue throughout the person’s lifetime. There are many conditions that meet this broad definition, including, but not limited to, Autism, Asperger, depending on their needs, each participant receives anywhere from one to 24 hours of staff support daily. Personalized support focuses on the goals in each participant can include assistance in any or all of the following areas: problem solving, self care, health and safety, social skills, community integration, home maintenance, food and nutrition, shopping, money management, leisure activities and accessing community resources.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-aspen-hope-center.jpeg
Aspen Hope Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tancellcare.jpeg
Tancell Care
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspen Hope Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tancell Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Hope Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tancell Care in 2026.

Incident History — Aspen Hope Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Hope Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tancell Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tancell Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-aspen-hope-center.jpeg
Aspen Hope Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tancellcare.jpeg
Tancell Care
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tancell Care company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspen Hope Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tancell Care company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspen Hope Center company.

In the current year, Tancell Care company and Aspen Hope Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tancell Care company nor Aspen Hope Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tancell Care company nor Aspen Hope Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tancell Care company nor Aspen Hope Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspen Hope Center company nor Tancell Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspen Hope Center company nor Tancell Care company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tancell Care company employs more people globally than Aspen Hope Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspen Hope Center nor Tancell Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References