Comparison Overview

The Arc of Indiana

VS

California Competes

The Arc of Indiana

143 W Market St, None, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-23
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.arcind.org

The Arc of Indiana, founded in 1956, is committed to all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities realizing their goals of living, learning, working and fully participating in the community. We are home to The Arc Master Trust, Indiana’s leading special needs trust, serving Hoosiers of all disabilities since 1988, and affiliated with The Arc of the United States. The Arc of Indiana Foundation works to create employment opportunities for people with disabilities, including opportunities through Erskine Green Training Institute.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

California Competes

1999 Harrison St, Suite 1900, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://californiacompetes.org/

California Competes develops nonpartisan and financially pragmatic recommendations for improved policies and practices in California higher education. Opportunity, creativity, enterprise, efficiency, and equity are the lenses through which California Competes serves to guide the state in improving postsecondary education to drive economic growth and build vibrant communities. Since 2011, California Competes’ research, policy briefs, and analyses have identified and honed in on the challenges of California’s higher education system and the actions policymakers must take to address them. Headquartered in Oakland, our staff brings a range of skills and expertise forward to advance public policy in the state.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-arc-of-indiana.jpeg
The Arc of Indiana
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-competes.jpeg
California Competes
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Arc of Indiana
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
California Competes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Arc of Indiana in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Competes in 2025.

Incident History — The Arc of Indiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Arc of Indiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — California Competes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Competes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-arc-of-indiana.jpeg
The Arc of Indiana
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-competes.jpeg
California Competes
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Arc of Indiana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Competes company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, California Competes company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Arc of Indiana company.

In the current year, California Competes company and The Arc of Indiana company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither California Competes company nor The Arc of Indiana company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither California Competes company nor The Arc of Indiana company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither California Competes company nor The Arc of Indiana company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Arc of Indiana company nor California Competes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Arc of Indiana company nor California Competes company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Arc of Indiana company employs more people globally than California Competes company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Arc of Indiana nor California Competes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References