Comparison Overview

Arab Gulf States Institute

VS

Veolia Institute

Arab Gulf States Institute

1150 15th St NW, 600, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749

The Arab Gulf States Institute (AGSI) is an independent, nonprofit institution dedicated to highlighting the importance of the relationship between the United States and the Gulf region through free and open exchange of multiple points of view on issues that concern the Gulf. AGSI strives to support this goal by: –Providing expert analysis and thoughtful debate on the economic, energy, environmental, security, social, cultural, and political dimensions of the Gulf Arab states as well as their relations with the United States and other countries. –Informing a global audience of policymakers, legislators, businesspeople, academics, media, youth, and others as the foundation for strategic decisions regarding this important region. –Employing multiple avenues to inform public understanding of the importance of the relationship between the United States and the Gulf Arab states. –Encouraging strong academic coverage by developing scholars who concentrate on the study of the region.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Veolia Institute

30 rue Madeleine Vionnet, Aubervilliers, 93300, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

The Veolia Group set up the Institute in 2001 as an independent space for collective thinking, as a platform for discussion and debate, the Institute explores the future at the interface between society and the environment. Our work focuses on the following themes: - Access to essential services - Biodiversity - Climate Change - Governance and societal debate - Resources and the circular economy - Health and Environment - Cities and urban services

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-arab-gulf-states-institute.jpeg
Arab Gulf States Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veolia-institute.jpeg
Veolia Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arab Gulf States Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Veolia Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arab Gulf States Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Arab Gulf States Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arab Gulf States Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Veolia Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-arab-gulf-states-institute.jpeg
Arab Gulf States Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veolia-institute.jpeg
Veolia Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arab Gulf States Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Veolia Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Veolia Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arab Gulf States Institute company.

In the current year, Veolia Institute company and Arab Gulf States Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Veolia Institute company nor Arab Gulf States Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Veolia Institute company nor Arab Gulf States Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Veolia Institute company nor Arab Gulf States Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute company nor Veolia Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Veolia Institute company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Arab Gulf States Institute company.

Arab Gulf States Institute company employs more people globally than Veolia Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arab Gulf States Institute nor Veolia Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X