Comparison Overview

The Antithesis

VS

Reader's Digest

The Antithesis

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.theantithesis.net

The Antithesis is simply about creating luxurious products for luxury clients, and making each product unique, visually arresting and intelligent. Whether it be in print, on the web or multimedia format, we guarantee style, aesthetics and perfection at all levels. In addition to our core business of producing luxury custom publications for some of the world’s most recognised and coveted brands, we also create high-end coffee table books on a diverse range of subjects, from architecture to cuisine and photography to wine. In line with the digital age, we also develop online presence for both our products and those of our clients, along with apps for iPhone and iPad. The Antithesis also undertakes a wide range of design projects for luxury clients looking for something different. Our music and video production arms also allow us to offer a total package and a one-stop-shop. To put it simply, mediocrity is not part of our vocabulary...

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Reader's Digest

New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.rd.com/

We offer a unique stream of advice, stories, humor, and user-generated content that connects on a personal level with a rapidly growing audience of readers. Why? Because our content has the unusual power to inspire, inform and entertain across multiple generations, reinforce optimism and believe in the human spirit, communicate plainly but intelligently and help people get healthier, smarter and happier.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-antithesis.jpeg
The Antithesis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/readersdigest.jpeg
Reader's Digest
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Antithesis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reader's Digest
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Antithesis in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reader's Digest in 2025.

Incident History — The Antithesis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Antithesis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reader's Digest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reader's Digest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-antithesis.jpeg
The Antithesis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/readersdigest.jpeg
Reader's Digest
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Antithesis company and Reader's Digest company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Reader's Digest company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Antithesis company.

In the current year, Reader's Digest company and The Antithesis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reader's Digest company nor The Antithesis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reader's Digest company nor The Antithesis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reader's Digest company nor The Antithesis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Antithesis company nor Reader's Digest company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Reader's Digest company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Antithesis company.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Antithesis nor Reader's Digest holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References