Comparison Overview

The American Civil Rights Union

VS

Center for Cultural Affairs

The American Civil Rights Union

3213 Duke St #625, None, Alexandria, VA, US, 22314
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) is dedicated to protecting the civil rights of all Americans by publicly advancing a Constitutional understanding of our essential rights and freedoms. The ACRU monitors and counters organizations that threaten our Constitutional rights. It files amicus briefs in critical civil rights cases, and defends the Constitution in print and broadcast media and on the Internet. The ACRU is committed to ensuring that those who believe in traditional moral values, such as the Boy Scouts of America, remain free to hold, express, teach and practice those beliefs. The ACRU believes that the U.S. Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, is the greatest legal document ever written. The ACRU stands against harmful, anti-Constitutional ideologies that have taken hold in our nation’s courts, law schools and bureaucracies. While others promote entitlements and license in the name of “liberties” and “identity” politics, the ACRU defends the civil rights for all set forth at the American Founding. As inheritors of this Constitutional republic, we affirm: •That all people are created equal, endowed by their Creator with the unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. •That it is the purpose of government to secure our God-given rights, not to restrict them, nor to invent new rights. •That it is the purpose of the judiciary to interpret the U.S. Constitution, not to make a selective interpretation, nor to legislate, nor to repeal clauses deemed inappropriate. •That the free exercise of religion, the right of private organizations to associate freely, the right to free speech, and the right to keep and bear arms are essential civil rights to be protected, not undermined, by the judiciary.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Cultural Affairs

1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Center for Cultural Affairs at the O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs advances the understanding of the place of arts and culture in public life. The CCA facilitates a network of scholars and practitioners interested in advancing cultural affairs research, produces high-quality and relevant research on arts and cultural policy and management issues, and serves as a resource to the arts and cultural sector.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-american-civil-rights-union.jpeg
The American Civil Rights Union
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-cultural-affairs.jpeg
Center for Cultural Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The American Civil Rights Union
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Cultural Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The American Civil Rights Union in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Cultural Affairs in 2025.

Incident History — The American Civil Rights Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The American Civil Rights Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Cultural Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Cultural Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-american-civil-rights-union.jpeg
The American Civil Rights Union
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-cultural-affairs.jpeg
Center for Cultural Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Cultural Affairs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The American Civil Rights Union company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Cultural Affairs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The American Civil Rights Union company.

In the current year, Center for Cultural Affairs company and The American Civil Rights Union company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs company nor The American Civil Rights Union company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs company nor The American Civil Rights Union company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs company nor The American Civil Rights Union company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union company nor Center for Cultural Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union company nor Center for Cultural Affairs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Cultural Affairs company employs more people globally than The American Civil Rights Union company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The American Civil Rights Union nor Center for Cultural Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H