Comparison Overview

The Afterlife Conference

VS

The Sydney Institute

The Afterlife Conference

Summerlinn Drive, West Linn, OREGON, US, 97068
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Afterlife Education Foundation/Death Awareness Institute was launched in 2010 when a group of renowned spiritual teachers, afterlife researchers, hospice workers, psychic mediums and grief counselors recognized the need for a national conference on the afterlife. We felt that our perspective on the continuation of consciousness after death wasn't adequately represented in traditional forums such as scientific or bereavement conferences, so motivated by a desire to share our knowledge, we produced The First Annual Afterlife Awareness Conference in 2011. When we started out, we were the only afterlife conference on the scene. Now there are several, and we applaud their contributions to this important work. Our annual conference blurs the boundaries between between intuitive experience and scientific research, and between religious traditions and a spirituality of oneness to increase awareness of life beyond the physical body. We unite the disciplines in furthering a deeper understanding of the survival of consciousness after death, bringing together hospice workers, physicians, mediums, clergy, counselors and alternative healers with a common goal... to offer a deeper understanding of death and beyond. ​​Our presenters are the best and the brightest in the fields of afterlife research, hospice care, near-death experience, after-death communication and bereavement.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Sydney Institute

41 Phillip St, SYDNEY, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-04

The Sydney Institute was formally opened on 23 August 1989 at its 41 Phillip Street premises by New South Wales Premier Nick Greiner with supporting remarks from Bob Carr (the then NSW Opposition leader). The Sydney Institute is a privately funded not-for-profit current affairs forum encouraging debate and discussion. The Institute is genuinely pluralist and a wide and diverse range of views are heard at its forums. The Institute conducts about 60 policy forums a year (held usually between 6 pm and 7 pm) on a wide range of issues – including economics, politics, international affairs, literature, history, film, social policy – along with a well attended annual dinner/lecture. Past speakers at the dinner have included George Miller, Shirley Hazzard, Peter Cosgrove, Simone Young, Andy Thomas, Peter Doherty, Patricia Hewitt, William Shawcross, Kate Jennings, Richard Tognetti, Clive James, Tom Friedman, Kevin Rudd, Quentin Bryce and Simon Schama. All speeches given at the Institute are published in The Sydney Papers Online which has a wide and influential circulation list – including business, media, university, college and school libraries. The Institute also publishes The Sydney Institute Quarterly incorporating “Gerard Henderson’s Media Watch” (which commenced publication in April 1988 and was first into the field of media watching in Australia). The Sydney Institute receives support from the Australian business community – but has no agenda beyond supporting debate and discussion. Nicholas Johnson is the Institute’s chairman, Rob Ferguson is deputy chairman and Paul Murnane is treasurer – and the Institute’s board includes Joe Gersh, Carolyn Kay, Carol Schwartz and Craig Shapiro. Supporters of the Institute extend well beyond the business community and include academics, public servants, editors, journalists, commentators, writers and members of the professions – as well as other Australians who recognise the importance of debate and discussion.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-afterlife-conference.jpeg
The Afterlife Conference
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-sydney-institute.jpeg
The Sydney Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Afterlife Conference
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Sydney Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Afterlife Conference in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Sydney Institute in 2025.

Incident History — The Afterlife Conference (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Afterlife Conference cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Sydney Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Sydney Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-afterlife-conference.jpeg
The Afterlife Conference
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-sydney-institute.jpeg
The Sydney Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Afterlife Conference company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Sydney Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Sydney Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Afterlife Conference company.

In the current year, The Sydney Institute company and The Afterlife Conference company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Sydney Institute company nor The Afterlife Conference company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Sydney Institute company nor The Afterlife Conference company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Sydney Institute company nor The Afterlife Conference company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Afterlife Conference company nor The Sydney Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Afterlife Conference company nor The Sydney Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Sydney Institute company employs more people globally than The Afterlife Conference company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Afterlife Conference nor The Sydney Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X